Suppr超能文献

混合式学习和学习模式如何影响学习成果?

How Do B-Learning and Learning Patterns Influence Learning Outcomes?

作者信息

Sáiz Manzanares María Consuelo, Marticorena Sánchez Raúl, García Osorio César Ignacio, Díez-Pastor José F

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of BurgosBurgos, Spain.

Department of Civil Engineering, University of BurgosBurgos, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 May 16;8:745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00745. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Learning Management System (LMS) platforms provide a wealth of information on the learning patterns of students. Learning Analytics (LA) techniques permit the analysis of the logs or records of the activities of both students and teachers on the on-line platform. The learning patterns differ depending on the type of Blended Learning (B-Learning). In this study, we analyse: (1) whether significant differences exist between the learning outcomes of students and their learning patterns on the platform, depending on the type of B-Learning [Replacement blend (RB) vs. Supplemental blend (SB)]; (2) whether a relation exists between the metacognitive and the motivational strategies (MS) of students, their learning outcomes and their learning patterns on the platform. The 87,065 log records of 129 students (69 in RB and 60 in SB) in the Moodle 3.1 platform were analyzed. The results revealed different learning patterns between students depending on the type of B-Learning (RB vs. SB). We have found that the degree of blend, RB vs. SB, seems to condition student behavior on the platform. Learning patterns in RB environments can predict student learning outcomes. Additionally, in RB environments there is a relationship between the learning patterns and the metacognitive and (MS) of the students.

摘要

学习管理系统(LMS)平台提供了大量有关学生学习模式的信息。学习分析(LA)技术允许对在线平台上学生和教师活动的日志或记录进行分析。学习模式因混合式学习(B-Learning)的类型而异。在本研究中,我们分析:(1)根据B-Learning的类型[替换混合(RB)与补充混合(SB)],学生的学习成果与其在平台上的学习模式之间是否存在显著差异;(2)学生的元认知和动机策略(MS)、他们的学习成果以及他们在平台上的学习模式之间是否存在关联。对Moodle 3.1平台上129名学生(69名在RB组和60名在SB组)的87,065条日志记录进行了分析。结果显示,根据B-Learning的类型(RB与SB),学生之间存在不同的学习模式。我们发现,混合程度,RB与SB,似乎会影响学生在平台上的行为。RB环境中的学习模式可以预测学生的学习成果。此外,在RB环境中,学习模式与学生的元认知和(MS)之间存在关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36fb/5432653/20f4d6705c63/fpsyg-08-00745-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
How Do B-Learning and Learning Patterns Influence Learning Outcomes?
Front Psychol. 2017 May 16;8:745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00745. eCollection 2017.
2
Improve teaching with modalities and collaborative groups in an LMS: an analysis of monitoring using visualisation techniques.
J Comput High Educ. 2021;33(3):747-778. doi: 10.1007/s12528-021-09289-9. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
3
Does the Use of Learning Management Systems With Hypermedia Mean Improved Student Learning Outcomes?
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 12;10:88. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00088. eCollection 2019.
4
How learning analytics can early predict under-achieving students in a blended medical education course.
Med Teach. 2017 Jul;39(7):757-767. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1309376. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
5
A Moodle-based blended learning solution for physiology education in Montenegro: a case study.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Mar 1;42(1):111-117. doi: 10.1152/advan.00155.2017.
8
Procrastinating Behavior in Computer-Based Learning Environments to Predict Performance: A Case Study in Moodle.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 24;8:1403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01403. eCollection 2017.
10
Differential efficacy of the resources used in B-learning environments.
Psicothema. 2019 May;31(2):170-178. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.330.

引用本文的文献

2
Individualized high-resolution analysis to categorize diverse learning and memory deficits in tau rTg4510 mice exposed to low-intensity blast.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2024 Jun 13;18:1397046. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1397046. eCollection 2024.
4
[Moodle, a credible alternative pedagogy for teaching medicine in a tropical environment to address large numbers and pandemic situations?].
Med Trop Sante Int. 2021 Mar 29;1(1). doi: 10.48327/mtsimagazine.n1.2021.76. eCollection 2021 Mar 31.
5
Teacher Training Effectiveness in Self-Regulation in Virtual Environments.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:776806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.776806. eCollection 2022.
6
The Impact of Collaborative Learning and Personality on Satisfaction in Innovative Teaching Context.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:713497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713497. eCollection 2021.
7
Applications of laboratory findings in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of COVID-19.
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Aug 25;6(1):316. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00731-z.
8
Enhancing Internal Learning in Teams: The Role of Network Centrality and Psychological Capital of Undergraduate Students.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 10;11:2197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02197. eCollection 2020.
9
Effectiveness of Using Voice Assistants in Learning: A Study at the Time of COVID-19.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 4;17(15):5618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155618.
10
Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Nursing Education.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 1;17(5):1589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051589.

本文引用的文献

1
Student Attitudes toward Learning Analytics in Higher Education: ".
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 19;7:1959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01959. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验