• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing postoperative voiding dysfunction after mid-urethral sling using either a Babcock or Kelly clamp tensioning technique.比较使用巴布科克钳或凯利钳张紧技术的经尿道中段吊带术后排尿功能障碍情况。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb;30(2):301-305. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3638-y. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
2
Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.两种用于尿道中段吊带张力调整的术中技术:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):471-481. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004027.
3
Predictors of early postoperative voiding dysfunction and other complications following a midurethral sling.经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术后早期排尿功能障碍及其他并发症的预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):656.e1-656.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Early voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling surgery: comparison of two management approaches.经尿道中段吊带手术后早期排尿功能障碍:两种治疗方法的比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Oct;28(10):1515-1526. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3302-y. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
5
Predictors of sling revision after mid-urethral sling procedures: a case-control study.经尿道中段吊带手术后吊带修复的预测因素:病例对照研究。
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):419-426. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15470. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
6
Incidence of successful voiding and predictors of early voiding dysfunction after retropubic sling.耻骨后吊带术后成功排尿的发生率及早期排尿功能障碍的预测因素
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Aug;27(8):1209-14. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2972-1. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
Postoperative catheterization, urinary retention, and permanent voiding dysfunction after polytetrafluroethylene suburethral sling placement.聚四氟乙烯尿道下吊带置入术后的术后导尿、尿潴留及永久性排尿功能障碍。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;87(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00347-9.
8
Assessment of voiding after sling: a randomized trial of 2 methods of postoperative catheter management after midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women.吊带术后排尿评估:一项针对女性压力性尿失禁行中段尿道吊带手术后两种术后导尿管管理方法的随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):597.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.033. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
9
Comparing the risk of urethrolysis for the treatment of voiding dysfunction between two retropubic mesh slings: a case-control study.比较两种耻骨后网状吊带治疗排尿功能障碍时尿道松解的风险:一项病例对照研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Apr;24(4):589-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1920-y. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
10
Surgeon volume and reoperation risk after midurethral sling surgery.尿道中段吊带手术后的外科医生手术量和再次手术风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;221(5):523.e1-523.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Babcock versus Scissor Tensioning for Retropubic Mid-Urethral Slings: Comparing Two Intra-Operative Techniques Through 5 Years of Follow-Up.耻骨后中段尿道吊带术的巴布科克法与剪刀式张力调整法:通过5年随访比较两种手术技术
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb;36(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05916-y. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Nursing assistants' knowledge, attitudes and training needs regarding urinary incontinence in nursing homes: a mixed-methods study.养老院护理助理对尿失禁的知识、态度和培训需求:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 22;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03762-z.
3
Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.两种用于尿道中段吊带张力调整的术中技术:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):471-481. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004027.

本文引用的文献

1
Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms After Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.女性压力性尿失禁手术后膀胱过度活动症症状的变化
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;126(2):423-430. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000929.
2
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
3
Risk factors for incomplete bladder emptying after midurethral sling.尿道中段悬吊术后膀胱排空不全的危险因素。
Urology. 2013 Nov;82(5):1038-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.060.
4
Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.手术与物理疗法治疗压力性尿失禁。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1124-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210627.
5
TVT compared with TVT-O and TOT: results from the Norwegian National Incontinence Registry.经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT)与经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT - O)及耻骨后尿道中段吊带术(TOT)的比较:来自挪威国家尿失禁登记处的结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Nov;21(11):1321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1195-0. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
6
Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.AUA 女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗指南更新。
J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1906-14. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2369. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
7
Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的微创合成尿道下吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2.
8
Effect of tension-free vaginal tape in women with a urodynamic diagnosis of idiopathic detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence.无张力阴道吊带术对尿动力学诊断为特发性逼尿肌过度活动和压力性尿失禁女性的影响。
BJOG. 2006 Jan;113(1):30-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00810.x.
9
Incidence and predictors of prolonged urinary retention after TVT with and without concurrent prolapse surgery.经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术(TVT)联合或不联合同期盆底器官脱垂手术术后长期尿潴留的发生率及预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.623.
10
Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out.
Eur Urol. 2003 Dec;44(6):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.003.

比较使用巴布科克钳或凯利钳张紧技术的经尿道中段吊带术后排尿功能障碍情况。

Comparing postoperative voiding dysfunction after mid-urethral sling using either a Babcock or Kelly clamp tensioning technique.

作者信息

Chang Olivia H, Hacker Michele R, Rosenblatt Peter L, Neo Dayna, Von Bargen Emily, Berrahou Iman, Le Amy, Lefevre Roger, Hota Lekha S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb;30(2):301-305. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3638-y. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-018-3638-y
PMID:29600405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6163097/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to compare postoperative urinary retention using the Babcock and Kelly clamps for retropubic midurethral sling (RPS) tensioning.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort of isolated RPS procedures from December 2010 through April 2016 by five fellowship-trained surgeons at two institutions. Slings were tensioned with a Babcock clamp by grasping a 3-mm midline fold of mesh (RPS-B) or a Kelly clamp as a spacer between the sling and suburethral tissue (RPS-K). Assessment of urinary retention included the primary outcome of postoperative catheterization and several secondary outcomes, including discharge home with a catheter, within 1 year of surgery. Analysis of covariance was used to compute the mean difference in duration of catheterization and log-binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

We included 240 patients. The RPS-B group had a lower body mass index and was more likely to be menopausal, have had pelvic organ prolapse surgery, and have a lower maximum urethral closure pressure than the RPS-K group. The mean duration of catheterization was similar, as demonstrated by the crude (0.21 days [-0.30-0.71]) and BMI-adjusted (0.07 days [-0.41-0.55]) mean difference in duration of catheterization. The incidence of postoperative OAB symptoms was comparable between the groups (BMI-adjusted RR: 0.95 (0.80-1.1)), and the incidence of revision did not differ (p = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The Babcock and Kelly clamp tensioning techniques appear comparable, with a low incidence of prolonged postoperative catheterization. Most catheters were removed on the day of the surgery. It is reasonable to tension retropubic midurethral slings with either method.

摘要

引言与假设

目的是比较使用巴布科克钳和凯利钳进行耻骨后中段尿道吊带(RPS)张紧术后尿潴留的情况。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2010年12月至2016年4月期间在两家机构由五位接受过专科培训的外科医生进行的孤立RPS手术。使用巴布科克钳通过抓住3毫米中线网状褶皱(RPS-B)来张紧吊带,或使用凯利钳作为吊带与尿道下组织之间的间隔物(RPS-K)。尿潴留的评估包括术后导尿的主要结局以及几个次要结局,包括术后1年内带导尿管出院。采用协方差分析计算导尿持续时间的平均差异,采用对数二项回归计算风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

我们纳入了240例患者。与RPS-K组相比,RPS-B组的体重指数较低,更可能处于绝经状态、接受过盆腔器官脱垂手术,且最大尿道闭合压较低。导尿的平均持续时间相似粗差(0.21天[-0.30 - 0.71])和经体重指数调整后的导尿持续时间平均差异(0.07天[-0.41 - 0.55])均表明了这一点。两组术后膀胱过度活动症症状的发生率相当(经体重指数调整后的RR:0.95(0.80 - 1.1)),翻修发生率也无差异(p = 0.7)。

结论

巴布科克钳和凯利钳张紧技术似乎相当,术后长时间导尿的发生率较低。大多数导尿管在手术当天拔除。用这两种方法之一张紧耻骨后中段尿道吊带是合理的。