Berger Marina, Richtig Georg, Kashofer Karl, Aigelsreiter Ariane, Richtig Erika
Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria -
G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Jun;153(3):349-360. doi: 10.23736/S0392-0488.18.05970-9. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
Treatment options in advanced melanoma have been subject to a major change over the last years. The discovery of the oncogenic point mutation BRAFV600E and subsequently developed BRAF inhibitors had a major impact on patient's survival. Further important mutations have been found in the NRAS gene, although not yet druggable, and others involve c-kit in acral and mucosal melanoma. Imatinib was shown to achieve high response rates in c-kit mutated melanoma. Despite good response rates in these targeted therapies and introduction of immunotherapy, there are still patients left, who develop resistance upon therapy or patients without the option of targeted therapy. Therefore it is necessary to identify further therapeutic options for this subset of patients. Several new mutations have been described so far that might be suitable for targeted therapy or useful as clinical biomarkers. Alterations in various receptor tyrosine kinases lead to constitutively activated downstream signaling and might be responsible for non-response to common therapies. In contrast, tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib or nilotinib could be suitable for patients harboring those alterations. Additionally, chromosomal rearrangements have been described in many different cancer types, resulting in oncogenic fusion proteins that involve BRAF, ROS1, NTRK, ALK and others. These are an emerging therapeutic field, especially in spitzoid melanomas. Further mutations have been detected in the neurofibromin 1 and RAC1 gene, although the clinical relevance is still not fully revealed. Within this review we will summarize the current evidence and focus on possible further upcoming targets and therapeutic opportunities in BRAFwt/NRASwt/KITwt melanoma.
在过去几年中,晚期黑色素瘤的治疗选择发生了重大变化。致癌性点突变BRAFV600E的发现以及随后开发的BRAF抑制剂对患者的生存率产生了重大影响。在NRAS基因中发现了其他重要突变,尽管尚未有可靶向的药物,在肢端和黏膜黑色素瘤中还涉及c-kit。伊马替尼在c-kit突变的黑色素瘤中显示出高缓解率。尽管这些靶向治疗有良好的缓解率且引入了免疫疗法,但仍有患者在治疗后产生耐药性,或者没有靶向治疗的选择。因此,有必要为这部分患者确定更多的治疗选择。到目前为止,已经描述了几种可能适用于靶向治疗或用作临床生物标志物的新突变。各种受体酪氨酸激酶的改变导致下游信号通路持续激活,可能是对常规治疗无反应的原因。相比之下,舒尼替尼或尼洛替尼等酪氨酸激酶抑制剂可能适用于携带这些改变的患者。此外,在许多不同类型的癌症中都描述了染色体重排,产生了涉及BRAF、ROS1、NTRK、ALK等的致癌融合蛋白。这些是一个新兴的治疗领域,尤其是在梭形细胞黑色素瘤中。在神经纤维瘤病1和RAC1基因中也检测到了其他突变,尽管其临床相关性仍未完全揭示。在本综述中,我们将总结当前的证据,并关注BRAF野生型/NRAS野生型/KIT野生型黑色素瘤中可能出现的进一步靶点和治疗机会。