Pellicano Rinaldo, Zagari Rocco M, Zhang Songhua, Saracco Giorgio M, Moss Steven F
Unit of Gastroenterology, Molinette-SGAS Hospital, Turin, Italy -
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2018 Sep;64(3):310-321. doi: 10.23736/S1121-421X.18.02492-3. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Over the past 30 years, multidrug regimens consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two or three antibiotics have been used in treating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In clinical practice, the optimal regimen to cure H. pylori infection should be decided regionally. Considering the first treatment, the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report and the American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Management Guideline highlight that in countries with low clarithromycin resistance rates (<15%), an empiric clarithromycin-based regimen can be used. In countries with high clarithromycin resistance rates or, in the American Guideline, with a previous exposure to clarithromycin, a bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (with metronidazole and tetracycline) is the first choice. In case of persistent infection, after a previous clarithromycin-containing regimen, this drug should be avoided in second line therapy. Options after initial eradication failure include tailored therapy (choosing antibiotic combinations based on antibiotic susceptibility testing), empiric bismuth-containing quadruple therapy or triple levofloxacin-based therapy. Encouraging data are reported, both for the first-line and for rescue treatments, with the use of a formulation of bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole, and tetracycline contained in a single capsule, together with a PPI. Rifabutin- and furazolidone-based regimens should also be considered in rescue regimens. Vonoprazan, a new type of potassium-competitive acid blocker that produces more potent acid inhibition than PPIs, provides improved H. pylori eradication rates in combination with antibiotics. In this review, the authors provide an overview on the current knowledge on the treatment of H. pylori infection, with focus on therapeutic challenges in this field.
在过去30年中,由质子泵抑制剂(PPI)和两种或三种抗生素组成的多药联合方案一直用于治疗幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)感染。在临床实践中,治愈幽门螺杆菌感染的最佳方案应根据地区情况来决定。考虑初次治疗时,《马斯特里赫特V/佛罗伦萨共识报告》和美国胃肠病学会临床管理指南强调,在克拉霉素耐药率较低(<15%)的国家,可使用经验性的以克拉霉素为基础的方案。在克拉霉素耐药率较高的国家,或者在美国指南中,对于曾接触过克拉霉素的患者,含铋剂的四联疗法(联合甲硝唑和四环素)是首选。如果出现持续感染,在之前使用过含克拉霉素方案后,二线治疗应避免使用该药物。初次根除失败后的选择包括个体化治疗(根据抗生素敏感性试验选择抗生素组合)、经验性含铋剂的四联疗法或三联左氧氟沙星疗法。有令人鼓舞的数据报道了含铋剂的枸橼酸铋钾、甲硝唑和四环素单一胶囊制剂与PPI联合用于一线和挽救治疗的情况。挽救方案中也应考虑基于利福布汀和呋喃唑酮的方案。沃克拉唑是一种新型钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂,其产酸抑制作用比PPI更强,与抗生素联合使用时可提高幽门螺杆菌根除率。在本综述中,作者概述了目前关于幽门螺杆菌感染治疗的知识,重点关注该领域的治疗挑战。