David Mírian Celly Medeiros Miranda, Moraes Alexa Alves de, Costa Maíra Lopes da, Franco Carlúcia Ithamar Fernandes
a Physiotherapy Department , Paraíba State University , Campina Grande , Brazil.
b Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavior, Federal University of Paraiba , João Pessoa , Brazil.
Neurol Res. 2018 Jul;40(7):555-563. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1453190. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Objective To investigate the neuromodulating effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Neuropathic Pain (NP). Method A systematic review of articles published in the past five years in MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PEDro. The search was carried out from February to May 2017 using the keywords: neuropathic pain, neuralgia, nerve pain, central pain, peripheral nerve pain, tDCS. The selected studies were full articles written in Portuguese, English, or Spanish with at least one control group, and no less than one pre- or post-intervention variable, with the exclusion of case studies or case series, animal model studies, and studies with combined therapy. The quality of the selected articles was evaluated through PEDro scale, whereas the level of agreement among reviewers was measured with the Cohen's κ test, considering P < 0.05 to be significant. Results Eight articles were selected (PEDro: 8.5 ± 0.6; Cohen's κ test: 0.703, P < 0.01), six of which were randomized controlled trials and two were controlled clinical trials. The following causes of NP were observed: spinal cord injury (SCI), amputation, stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), and radiculopathy. All of the studies showed significant effects of tDCS on NP when compared to the control group, except for one with SCI and another related to radiculopathy. Discussion The shortage of good quality articles, the varying of ramp-on and ramp-off durations, and number of sessions, as well as the diversity of results found did not allow any definite conclusion on the efficacy of the neuromodulating effect of tDCS on NP.
目的 探讨经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对神经性疼痛(NP)的神经调节作用。方法 对过去五年发表在MEDLINE、LILACS、Cochrane、Scopus、ScienceDirect和PEDro上的文章进行系统综述。检索于2017年2月至5月进行,使用关键词:神经性疼痛、神经痛、神经疼痛、中枢性疼痛、周围神经疼痛、tDCS。所选研究为用葡萄牙语、英语或西班牙语撰写的全文,至少有一个对照组,且干预前后变量不少于一个,排除病例研究或病例系列、动物模型研究以及联合治疗研究。通过PEDro量表评估所选文章的质量,而评审者之间的一致性水平用Cohen's κ检验测量,P < 0.05被认为具有显著性。结果 选择了8篇文章(PEDro:8.5 ± 0.6;Cohen's κ检验:0.703,P < 0.01),其中6篇为随机对照试验,2篇为对照临床试验。观察到的NP病因如下:脊髓损伤(SCI)、截肢、中风、多发性硬化(MS)和神经根病。与对照组相比,除了一项关于SCI的研究和另一项关于神经根病的研究外,所有研究均显示tDCS对NP有显著影响。讨论 高质量文章的缺乏、通电和断电持续时间以及疗程数量的变化,以及所发现结果的多样性,使得无法就tDCS对NP的神经调节作用的疗效得出任何明确结论。