Department of Intensive Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;46(7):e707-e714. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003129.
Chest radiograph is considered the first-line diagnostic imaging modality for patients presenting with pulmonary symptoms in the ICU. In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of chest radiograph, and when concomitantly studied lung ultrasound, in comparison with the gold-standard CT for adult critically ill patients with respiratory symptoms.
PubMed, EMBASE, and Gray literature.
Studies comparing chest radiograph, and if performed lung ultrasound, with CT for adult ICU patients with respiratory symptoms.
Quality was scored with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, and study setting, test characteristics, and study design were extracted.
In the meta-analysis, we included 10 full-text studies, including 543 patients, and found that chest radiograph has an overall sensitivity of 49% (95% CI, 40-58%) and specificity of 92% (86-95%). In seven studies, where also lung ultrasound was studied, lung ultrasound had an overall sensitivity of 95% (92-96%) and specificity of 94% (90-97%). Substantial heterogeneity was found. A planned subgroup analysis for individual pathologies was performed. The results of four abstract-only studies, included in the systematic review, were considered unlikely to significantly influence results of our meta-analysis. Study limitations were that most studies were of low power combined with methodological limitations.
This meta-analysis demonstrates that chest radiograph has a low sensitivity and reasonable specificity compared with CT for detecting lung pathology in critically ill patients. The studies also investigating lung ultrasound, showed lung ultrasound to be clearly superior to chest radiograph in terms of sensitivity with similar specificity, thereby opting to be the first-line diagnostic tool in these patients.
胸部 X 线摄影被认为是 ICU 中出现肺部症状的患者的一线诊断影像学方法。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估胸部 X 线摄影的诊断准确性,以及当与肺超声同时研究时,与成人危重症患者呼吸症状的金标准 CT 相比的准确性。
PubMed、EMBASE 和灰色文献。
比较胸部 X 线摄影和(如果进行的话)肺超声与 CT 用于有呼吸症状的成人 ICU 患者的研究。
使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2 对质量进行评分,并提取研究设置、测试特征和研究设计。
在荟萃分析中,我们纳入了 10 项全文研究,包括 543 名患者,发现胸部 X 线摄影的总体敏感度为 49%(95%CI,40-58%),特异性为 92%(86-95%)。在 7 项也研究了肺超声的研究中,肺超声的总体敏感度为 95%(92-96%),特异性为 94%(90-97%)。存在大量异质性。对个别病理进行了计划的亚组分析。系统评价中包含的四项仅摘要研究的结果被认为不太可能显著影响我们荟萃分析的结果。研究局限性在于大多数研究的效力较低,且存在方法学局限性。
这项荟萃分析表明,与 CT 相比,胸部 X 线摄影在检测危重症患者肺部病变方面的敏感性较低,但特异性较高。同时研究肺超声的研究表明,肺超声在敏感性方面明显优于胸部 X 线摄影,特异性相似,因此是这些患者的一线诊断工具。