Suppr超能文献

从食果性到种子传播:将植物-食果动物网络中相互作用的功能结果纳入其中。

Moving from frugivory to seed dispersal: Incorporating the functional outcomes of interactions in plant-frugivore networks.

机构信息

Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jul;87(4):995-1007. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12831. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

Abstract

There is growing interest in understanding the functional outcomes of species interactions in ecological networks. For many mutualistic networks, including pollination and seed dispersal networks, interactions are generally sampled by recording animal foraging visits to plants. However, these visits may not reflect actual pollination or seed dispersal events, despite these typically being the ecological processes of interest. Frugivorous animals can act as seed dispersers, by swallowing entire fruits and dispersing their seeds, or as pulp peckers or seed predators, by pecking fruits to consume pieces of pulp or seeds. These processes have opposing consequences for plant reproductive success. Therefore, equating visitation with seed dispersal could lead to biased inferences about the ecology, evolution and conservation of seed dispersal mutualisms. Here, we use natural history information on the functional outcomes of pairwise bird-plant interactions to examine changes in the structure of seven European plant-frugivore visitation networks after non-mutualistic interactions (pulp pecking and seed predation) have been removed. Following existing knowledge of the contrasting structures of mutualistic and antagonistic networks, we hypothesized a number of changes following interaction removal, such as increased nestedness and lower specialization. Non-mutualistic interactions with pulp peckers and seed predators occurred in all seven networks, accounting for 21%-48% of all interactions and 6%-24% of total interaction frequency. When non-mutualistic interactions were removed, there were significant increases in network-level metrics such as connectance and nestedness, while robustness decreased. These changes were generally small, homogenous and driven by decreases in network size. Conversely, changes in species-level metrics were more variable and sometimes large, with significant decreases in plant degree, interaction frequency, specialization and resilience to animal extinctions and significant increases in frugivore species strength. Visitation data can overestimate the actual frequency of seed dispersal services in plant-frugivore networks. We show here that incorporating natural history information on the functions of species interactions can bring us closer to understanding the processes and functions operating in ecological communities. Our categorical approach lays the foundation for future work quantifying functional interaction outcomes along a mutualism-antagonism continuum, as documented in other frugivore faunas.

摘要

人们越来越关注理解生态网络中物种相互作用的功能结果。对于许多互利网络,包括传粉和种子扩散网络,交互作用通常通过记录动物对植物的觅食访问来采样。然而,尽管这些通常是感兴趣的生态过程,但这些访问可能并不反映实际的传粉或种子扩散事件。食果动物可以通过吞下整个果实并散布它们的种子来充当种子散布者,也可以通过啄食果实来消耗果肉或种子的果肉啄食者或种子捕食者来充当果肉啄食者或种子捕食者。这些过程对植物繁殖成功率有相反的影响。因此,将访问等同于种子扩散可能会导致对种子扩散互利关系的生态、进化和保护产生有偏差的推断。在这里,我们使用关于鸟类-植物相互作用功能结果的自然历史信息来检查在去除非互利相互作用(果肉啄食和种子捕食)后,七个欧洲植物-食果者访问网络结构的变化。根据互利和拮抗网络结构的现有知识,我们假设在相互作用去除后会发生一些变化,例如嵌套度增加和专业化程度降低。具有果肉啄食和种子捕食的非互利相互作用发生在所有七个网络中,占所有相互作用的 21%-48%,占总相互作用频率的 6%-24%。当去除非互利相互作用时,网络级别的度量标准(如连接度和嵌套度)显著增加,而稳健性降低。这些变化通常很小、均匀,并且由网络规模的减少驱动。相反,物种级别的度量标准的变化更为多样,有时也很大,植物度、相互作用频率、专业化和对动物灭绝的恢复力显著降低,而食果动物物种强度显著增加。访问数据可能高估了植物-食果者网络中实际种子扩散服务的频率。我们在这里表明,将物种相互作用功能的自然历史信息纳入其中,可以使我们更接近理解生态群落中运作的过程和功能。我们的分类方法为未来沿着互利-拮抗连续体量化功能相互作用结果的工作奠定了基础,这在其他食果动物群中已有记录。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d0/6849527/2b35267b5623/JANE-87-995-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验