Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Center for Global Mountain Biodiversity, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Jun;6(6):720-729. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01693-3. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Climate-driven range shifts may cause local extinctions, while the accompanying loss of biotic interactions may trigger secondary coextinctions. At the same time, climate change may facilitate colonizations from regional source pools, balancing out local species loss. At present, how these extinction-coextinction-colonization dynamics affect biological communities under climate change is poorly understood. Using 84 communities of interacting plants and hummingbirds, we simulated patterns in climate-driven extinctions, coextinctions and colonizations under future climate change scenarios. Our simulations showed clear geographic discrepancies in the communities' vulnerability to climate change. Andean communities were the least affected by future climate change, as they experienced few climate-driven extinctions and coextinctions while having the highest colonization potential. In North America and lowland South America, communities had many climate-driven extinctions and few colonization events. Meanwhile, the pattern of coextinction was highly dependent on the configuration of networks formed by interacting hummingbirds and plants. Notably, North American communities experienced proportionally fewer coextinctions than other regions because climate-driven extinctions here primarily affected species with peripheral network roles. Moreover, coextinctions generally decreased in communities where species have few overlapping interactions, that is, communities with more complementary specialized and modular networks. Together, these results highlight that we should not expect colonizations to adequately balance out local extinctions in the most vulnerable ecoregions.
气候驱动的分布区变化可能导致局部灭绝,而伴随的生物相互作用的丧失可能引发次级协同灭绝。与此同时,气候变化可能促进来自区域源汇的殖民,从而平衡当地物种的丧失。目前,这些灭绝-协同灭绝-殖民动态如何影响气候变化下的生物群落还知之甚少。利用 84 个相互作用的植物和蜂鸟群落,我们模拟了未来气候变化情景下气候驱动的灭绝、协同灭绝和殖民的模式。我们的模拟结果显示,群落对气候变化的脆弱性存在明显的地理差异。安第斯山脉的群落受未来气候变化的影响最小,因为它们经历的气候驱动灭绝和协同灭绝很少,而具有最高的殖民潜力。在北美和南美洲低地,群落经历了许多气候驱动的灭绝,而殖民事件很少。同时,协同灭绝的模式高度依赖于相互作用的蜂鸟和植物形成的网络结构。值得注意的是,北美的群落经历的协同灭绝比例比其他地区少,因为这里的气候驱动灭绝主要影响具有外围网络角色的物种。此外,在物种相互作用较少的群落中,协同灭绝通常会减少,也就是说,具有更多互补专业化和模块化网络的群落。总之,这些结果表明,我们不应期望在最脆弱的生态区的殖民能够充分平衡当地的灭绝。