• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

80-89 岁老年男性局限性前列腺癌:一项基于人群的登记研究结果。

Localised prostate cancer in elderly men aged 80-89 years, findings from a population-based registry.

机构信息

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

The South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:48-54. doi: 10.1111/bju.14228.

DOI:10.1111/bju.14228
PMID:29603585
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the rate of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and disease characteristics in patients diagnosed with localised prostate cancer at age 80-89 years in comparison with men diagnosed at age 70-79 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of data from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative (SA-PCCOC). Included were men diagnosed between 2005 and 2014, aged ≥70 years with no evidence of metastatic disease at presentation. Propensity score matching and competing risk Fine and Grey regression were used to assess the chance of treatment (curative vs non-curative) and treatment effect on PCSM.

RESULTS

Of the 1 951 eligible patients, 1 428 (76%) were aged 70-79 years and 460 (24%) were aged 80-89 years at diagnosis, with a median (interquartile range) age of 74 (72-76) and 83 (81-85) years, respectively. The 80-89 years group had higher Gleason scores and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) values (all P < 0.001) in comparison with the younger group. The 80-89 years group were less likely to be treated with curative treatment (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.16; P < 0.001). The proportion of deaths attributable to prostate cancer was similar in both groups: 73 of 263 deaths (28%) in the 80-89 years group vs 97 of 310 deaths (31%) in the 70-79 years group. The risk of PCSM in individuals treated with curative intent was reduced in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of prostate cancer deaths was similar in both groups. These findings support carefully selected individualised management of elderly patients diagnosed with localised prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

比较 80-89 岁和 70-79 岁诊断为局限性前列腺癌患者的前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)和疾病特征。

患者和方法

这是一项对南澳大利亚前列腺癌临床结果协作组(SA-PCCOC)数据的回顾性研究。纳入标准为 2005 年至 2014 年期间诊断、无远处转移证据且年龄≥70 岁的男性。采用倾向评分匹配和竞争风险 Fine 和 Grey 回归评估治疗(根治性与非根治性)的可能性和治疗对 PCSM 的影响。

结果

在 1951 名合格患者中,1428 名(76%)年龄为 70-79 岁,460 名(24%)年龄为 80-89 岁,中位(四分位间距)年龄分别为 74(72-76)和 83(81-85)岁。与年轻组相比,80-89 岁组的 Gleason 评分和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值更高(均 P<0.001)。80-89 岁组接受根治性治疗的可能性较低(优势比 0.12,95%置信区间 0.09-0.16;P<0.001)。两组因前列腺癌死亡的比例相似:80-89 岁组 263 例死亡中有 73 例(28%)归因于前列腺癌,70-79 岁组 310 例死亡中有 97 例(31%)归因于前列腺癌。两组接受根治性治疗的个体的 PCSM 风险均降低。

结论

两组的前列腺癌死亡比例相似。这些发现支持对诊断为局限性前列腺癌的老年患者进行仔细选择的个体化管理。

相似文献

1
Localised prostate cancer in elderly men aged 80-89 years, findings from a population-based registry.80-89 岁老年男性局限性前列腺癌:一项基于人群的登记研究结果。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:48-54. doi: 10.1111/bju.14228.
2
Initial management of prostate-specific antigen-detected, low-risk prostate cancer and the risk of death from prostate cancer.前列腺特异性抗原检出的低危前列腺癌的初始管理和前列腺癌死亡风险。
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11789.x. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
3
Advancing age within established Gleason score categories and the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).在既定的格里森评分类别内年龄增长与前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)的风险。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(7):973-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11470.x.
4
Commentary on "initial management of prostate-specific antigen-detected, low-risk prostate cancer and the risk of death from prostate cancer." Aizer AA, Chen MH, Hattangadi J, D'Amico AV. Harvard Radiation Oncology program, Boston, MA.: BJU Int 2013. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11789.x. [Epub ahead of print].关于“前列腺特异性抗原检测出的低风险前列腺癌的初始管理及前列腺癌死亡风险”的述评。作者:艾泽尔·AA、陈·MH、哈坦加迪·J、达米科·AV。哈佛放射肿瘤学项目,马萨诸塞州波士顿:《英国泌尿学杂志》2013年。doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11789.x。[印刷版前在线发表]
Urol Oncol. 2014 Feb;32(2):208-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.08.023.
5
NADiA ProsVue prostate-specific antigen slope, CAPRA-S, and prostate cancer--specific survival after radical prostatectomy.NADiA ProsVue前列腺特异性抗原斜率、CAPRA-S与前列腺癌根治术后的前列腺癌特异性生存
Urology. 2014 Dec;84(6):1427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.059.
6
Early detection of high-grade prostate cancer using digital rectal examination (DRE) in men with a prostate-specific antigen level of <2.5 ng/mL and the risk of death.使用前列腺特异性抗原水平<2.5ng/mL 的男性进行数字直肠检查(DRE)早期检测高级别前列腺癌与死亡风险。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1636-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11354.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.根治性前列腺切除术改善了 PSA 时代淋巴结阳性前列腺癌男性的无进展生存期和癌症特异性生存期:一项确认性研究。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09730.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
8
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
9
Larger maximum tumor diameter at radical prostatectomy is associated with increased biochemical failure, metastasis, and death from prostate cancer after salvage radiation for prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术后的最大肿瘤直径越大,前列腺癌挽救性放疗后发生生化失败、转移和前列腺癌死亡的风险就越高。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1;87(2):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.043. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
10
New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.新的前列腺癌分级系统可预测 Gleason 评分 8-10 级前列腺癌手术后的长期生存情况。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):907-912. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey Exploring Practice Patterns and Preferences of Uro-Oncologists in Northeast Italy.老年患者前列腺癌的诊断与治疗:一项探索意大利东北部泌尿肿瘤学家实践模式和偏好的横断面调查。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;15(9):1100. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091100.
2
Management considerations and treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in advanced age patients (≥80 years): real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.高龄患者(≥80岁)新诊断前列腺癌的管理考量与治疗结果:来自单一泌尿外科中心10年期间的真实世界数据
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1506-1516. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-134. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Time trends in the use of curative treatment in men 70 years and older with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.
70 岁及以上非转移性前列腺癌男性患者的根治性治疗方法的使用时间趋势。
Acta Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;63:95-104. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.26189.
4
How to choose proper local treatment in men aged ≥75 years with cT2 localized prostate cancer?对于年龄≥75 岁且患有 cT2 局限性前列腺癌的男性,如何选择合适的局部治疗方法?
Cancer Med. 2019 Jul;8(7):3370-3378. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2221. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Prostate cancer mortality is high in the elderly and can be reduced by selective individualized curative treatment.前列腺癌在老年人中的死亡率很高,可通过选择性个体化根治性治疗降低。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1799-1800. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2312-9. Epub 2018 May 10.