Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Aug;37(6):1925-1930. doi: 10.1002/nau.23568. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
While the effect of different types of incontinence on the quality of life (QoL) has been clearly documented, the information about the impact of incontinence severity on QoL in women is lacking. Therefore, we investigated whether increasingly severe degrees of incontinence were linearly correlated with poorer QoL.
We included 391 incontinent women and 81 continent volunteers in the study and assessed them in accordance with routine clinical practice. A 24 h pad-weight test was used to objectively quantify the incontinence severity. We then stratified participants according to incontinence type and severity and assessed correlations between incontinence severity and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), International Consultation on Incontinence short-form questionnaire (ICIQ-SF), and King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) quality of life scores in the entire study population and in individual groups according to incontinence type.
Minimal incontinence was associated with significant negative impact on QoL, as measured by all quality of life assement tools. There were nonlinear correlations between scores on individual questionnaires and daily leakage volumes. Stress urinary incontinence had a weaker impact on quality of life than urge or mixed incontinence, as measured by PPBC (P < 0.0001), KHQ part 1 (P < 0.0001), and KHQ part 2 (P < 0.001). Stress urinary incontinence also had a weaker impact on QoL than mixed incontinence as measured by ICI-Q (P = 0.007).
This study demonstrated that even mild urinary leakage significantly reduces the QoL, while subsequent increase in the degree of incontinence has only minimal additional effect. There was no linear correlation between incontinence severity and QoL.
虽然不同类型的失禁对生活质量(QoL)的影响已得到明确证实,但关于失禁严重程度对女性 QoL 的影响的信息却缺乏。因此,我们研究了失禁严重程度是否与 QoL 呈线性相关。
我们纳入了 391 名失禁女性和 81 名 continent 志愿者,并根据常规临床实践对她们进行评估。使用 24 小时垫重试验客观地量化失禁严重程度。然后,我们根据失禁类型和严重程度对参与者进行分层,并在整个研究人群以及根据失禁类型的各个组中评估失禁严重程度与膀胱状况患者感知(PPBC)、国际尿失禁咨询简表问卷(ICIQ-SF)和 King's 健康问卷(KHQ)生活质量评分之间的相关性。
轻度失禁与所有生活质量评估工具测量的 QoL 显著负相关。个体问卷评分与每日漏尿量之间存在非线性相关性。压力性尿失禁对生活质量的影响比急迫性或混合性尿失禁弱,这体现在 PPBC(P<0.0001)、KHQ 第 1 部分(P<0.0001)和 KHQ 第 2 部分(P<0.001)上。与混合性尿失禁相比,压力性尿失禁对 ICI-Q (P=0.007)的 QoL 影响也较弱。
本研究表明,即使是轻度的尿漏也会显著降低 QoL,而随后失禁程度的增加只会产生最小的额外影响。失禁严重程度与 QoL 之间没有线性相关性。