Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), 160012 Chandigarh, India.
Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), 160012 Chandigarh, India.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Feb;38(1):41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block, administered a little more medially, just close to the origin of the transverse abdominis muscle has not yet been investigated in patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. We hypothesised that medial transverse abdominis plane block would provide comparable postoperative analgesia to ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in inguinal hernia repair patients.
This prospective, randomised trial was conducted in 50 ASA I and II male patients≥18 years of age. Patients were randomised into two groups to receive either pre-incisional ipsilateral ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block or medial transverse abdominis plane block, with 0.3ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine. Our primary objective was postoperative 24-hour analgesic consumption and secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first request for rescue analgesic and side effects, if any, in the postoperative period.
There was no significant difference in the total postoperative analgesic consumption [group I: 66.04mg; group II: 68.33mg (P value 0.908)]. Time to first request for rescue analgesic was delayed, though statistically non-significant (P value 0.326), following medial transverse abdominis plane block, with excellent pain relief seen in 58.3% patients as opposed to 45.8% patients in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block group.
Medial transverse abdominis plane block being a novel, simple and easily performed procedure can serve as an useful alternative to ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for providing postoperative pain relief in inguinal hernia repair patients.
在接受单侧腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,尚未研究过在腹内斜肌平面阻滞稍内侧进针,即靠近腹横肌起点处进行镇痛的效果。我们假设内侧腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补患者中的术后镇痛效果与髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞相当。
本前瞻性随机试验纳入了 50 名年龄≥18 岁的 ASA I 和 II 级男性患者。患者随机分为两组,分别接受同侧超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞或内侧腹横肌平面阻滞,局麻药均为 0.3ml/kg 的 0.25%布比卡因。我们的主要目标是术后 24 小时的镇痛药物消耗量,次要结果包括疼痛评分、首次请求解救性镇痛的时间以及术后的任何副作用。
两组患者的总术后镇痛药物消耗量无显著差异[组 I:66.04mg;组 II:68.33mg(P 值 0.908)]。尽管统计学上无显著差异(P 值 0.326),但内侧腹横肌平面阻滞组首次请求解救性镇痛的时间延迟,58.3%的患者镇痛效果良好,而髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞组仅有 45.8%的患者镇痛效果良好。
内侧腹横肌平面阻滞是一种新颖、简单且易于操作的方法,可以作为髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞的替代方法,为腹股沟疝修补患者提供术后镇痛。