1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and.
2Divsion of Neurosurgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Apr;44(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17753.
OBJECTIVE Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are surgically challenging tumors that can severely impair vision. Debate exists regarding whether the transcranial (TC) or endoscopic transsphenoidal (TS) approach is best for resecting these tumors, and there are few large series comparing these approaches. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed at 2 academic centers comparing TC and TS approaches with respect to vision, extent of resection, recurrence, and complications. The authors report surgical outcomes and propose a simple preoperative tumor grading scale that scores tumor size (1-2), optic canal invasion (0-2), and arterial encasement (0-2). The authors performed univariate, multivariate, and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS The TSMs were resected in 139 patients. The median follow-up was 29 months. Ninety-five (68%) cases were resected via a TC and 44 (32%) via a TS approach. Tumors treated via a TC approach had a higher tumor (p = 0.0007), artery (p < 0.0001), and total score (p = 0.0012) on the grading scale. Preoperative visual deficits were present in 87% of patients. Vision improved in 47%, stayed the same in 35%, declined in 10%, and was not recorded in 8%. The extent of resection was 65% gross-total resection, 23% near-total resection (95%-99% resection), and 12% subtotal resection (< 95%). A lower tumor score was significantly associated with better or stable vision postoperatively (p = 0.0052). The RPA confirmed low tumor score as the key predictor of postoperative visual improvement or stability. Multivariate analysis and RPA demonstrate that lower canal score (p < 0.0001) and TC approach (p = 0.0019) are associated with gross-total resection. Complications occurred in 20 (14%) patients, including CSF leak (5%) and infection (4%). There was no difference in overall complication rates between TC and TS approaches; however, the TS approach had more CSF leaks (OR 5.96, 95% CI 1.10-32.04). The observed recurrence rate was 10%, and there was no difference between the TC and TS approaches. CONCLUSIONS Tuberculum sellae meningiomas can be resected using either a TC or TS approach, with low morbidity and good visual outcomes in appropriately selected patients. The simple proposed grading scale provides a standard preoperative method to evaluate TSMs and can serve as a starting point for selection of the surgical approach. Higher scores were associated with worsened visual outcomes and subtotal resection, regardless of approach. The authors plan a multicenter review of this grading scale to further evaluate its utility.
目的鞍结节脑膜瘤(TSMs)是手术极具挑战性的肿瘤,可严重损害视力。关于经颅(TC)或经蝶窦内镜(TS)入路切除这些肿瘤哪种方法更好,存在争议,很少有大型系列研究比较这两种方法。方法作者在 2 个学术中心进行了回顾性图表审查,比较了 TC 和 TS 方法在视力、切除范围、复发和并发症方面的情况。作者报告了手术结果,并提出了一种简单的术前肿瘤分级量表,对肿瘤大小(1-2)、视神经管侵犯(0-2)和动脉包埋(0-2)进行评分。作者进行了单变量、多变量和递归分区分析(RPA)以评估结果。结果共对 139 例 TSM 进行了切除术。中位随访时间为 29 个月。95 例(68%)经 TC 途径,44 例(32%)经 TS 途径进行了治疗。经 TC 途径治疗的肿瘤在肿瘤(p = 0.0007)、动脉(p < 0.0001)和总评分(p = 0.0012)上得分更高。术前存在视觉障碍的患者占 87%。47%的视力改善,35%的视力保持不变,10%的视力下降,8%的视力未记录。肿瘤切除程度为 65%大体全切除,23%近全切除(95%-99%切除),12%次全切除(<95%)。较低的肿瘤评分与术后视力改善或稳定显著相关(p = 0.0052)。RPA 证实低肿瘤评分是术后视力改善或稳定的关键预测因素。多变量分析和 RPA 表明,较低的管评分(p < 0.0001)和 TC 方法(p = 0.0019)与大体全切除有关。20 例(14%)患者出现并发症,包括脑脊液漏(5%)和感染(4%)。TC 和 TS 方法之间的总体并发症发生率没有差异;然而,TS 方法的脑脊液漏发生率更高(OR 5.96,95%CI 1.10-32.04)。观察到的复发率为 10%,TC 和 TS 方法之间没有差异。结论鞍结节脑膜瘤可以通过 TC 或 TS 方法进行切除,在适当选择的患者中具有较低的发病率和良好的视力结果。所提出的简单分级量表提供了一种标准的术前方法来评估 TSM,并可作为选择手术方法的起点。无论采用何种方法,较高的评分均与视力恶化和次全切除相关。作者计划对该分级量表进行多中心回顾,以进一步评估其效用。