Suppr超能文献

针对亚急性和慢性腰痛士兵的监督性运动计划后良好预后的预后因素。

Prognostic factors of a favorable outcome following a supervised exercise program for soldiers with sub-acute and chronic low back pain.

作者信息

Perron Marc, Gendron Chantal, Langevin Pierre, Leblond Jean, Roos Marianne, Roy Jean-Sébastien

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Local 4445, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.

Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Valcartier Garison, Quebec City, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 2;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2022-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) encompasses heterogeneous patients unlikely to respond to a unique treatment. Identifying sub-groups of LBP may help to improve treatment outcomes. This is a hypothesis-setting study designed to create a clinical prediction rule (CPR) that will predict favorable outcomes in soldiers with sub-acute and chronic LBP participating in a multi-station exercise program.

METHODS

Military members with LBP participated in a supervised program comprising 7 stations each consisting of exercises of increasing difficulty. Demographic, impairment and disability data were collected at baseline. The modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was administered at baseline and following the 6-week program. An improvement of 50% in the initial ODI score was considered the reference standard to determine a favorable outcome. Univariate associations with favorable outcome were tested using chi-square or paired t-tests. Variables that showed between-group (favorable/unfavorable) differences were entered into a logistic regression after determining the sampling adequacy. Finally, continuous variables were dichotomized and the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios were determined for the model and for each variable.

RESULTS

A sample of 85 participants was included in analyses. Five variables contributed to prediction of a favorable outcome: no pain in lying down (p = 0.017), no use of antidepressants (p = 0.061), FABQ work score < 22.5 (p = 0.061), fewer than 5 physiotherapy sessions before entering the program (p = 0.144) and less than 6 months' work restriction (p = 0.161). This model yielded a sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.80, LR+ of 3.88, and LR- of 0.28. A 77.5% probability of favorable outcome can be predicted by the presence of more than three of the five variables, while an 80% probability of unfavorable outcome can be expected if only three or fewer variables are present.

CONCLUSION

The use of prognostic factors may guide clinicians in identifying soldiers with LBP most likely to have a favorable outcome. Further validation studies are needed to determine if the variables identified in our study are treatment effect modifiers that can predict success following participation in the multi-station exercise program.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03464877 registered retrospectively on 14 March 2018.

摘要

背景

腰痛(LBP)患者情况各异,不太可能对单一治疗产生反应。识别腰痛亚组可能有助于改善治疗效果。这是一项假设设定研究,旨在创建一个临床预测规则(CPR),以预测参与多站式锻炼计划的亚急性和慢性腰痛士兵的良好治疗效果。

方法

患有腰痛的军人参加了一个有监督的计划,该计划包括7个站点,每个站点的锻炼难度逐渐增加。在基线时收集人口统计学、损伤和残疾数据。在基线时和为期6周的计划结束后使用改良的奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)。初始ODI评分提高50%被视为确定良好治疗效果的参考标准。使用卡方检验或配对t检验来检验与良好治疗效果的单变量关联。在确定抽样充分性后,将显示组间(良好/不良)差异的变量纳入逻辑回归。最后,将连续变量进行二分法处理,并确定模型及每个变量的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比。

结果

85名参与者的样本纳入分析。五个变量有助于预测良好的治疗效果:平躺时无疼痛(p = 0.017)、未使用抗抑郁药(p = 0.061)、FABQ工作评分<22.5(p = 0.061)、进入该计划前接受物理治疗的次数少于5次(p = 0.144)以及工作限制少于6个月(p = 0.161)。该模型的敏感性为0.78,特异性为0.80,阳性似然比为3.88,阴性似然比为0.28。如果存在五个变量中的三个以上,则可预测良好治疗效果的概率为77.5%,而如果只有三个或更少变量,则不良治疗效果的概率预计为80%。

结论

使用预后因素可能会指导临床医生识别最有可能获得良好治疗效果的腰痛士兵。需要进一步的验证研究来确定我们研究中确定的变量是否为治疗效果修饰因素,能够预测参与多站式锻炼计划后的成功情况。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03464877,于2018年3月14日进行追溯注册。

相似文献

3
Predictors of functional improvement in people with chronic low back pain following a graded Pilates-based exercise programme.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jan;23(1):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
5
Determining Predictive Outcome Factors for a Multimodal Treatment Program in Low Back Pain Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Nov-Dec;40(9):659-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.09.001.
7
Predicting three-month functional outcomes after an ED visit for acute low back pain.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;35(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3.
2
Estimating the Risk of Chronic Pain: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model (PICKUP) for Patients with Acute Low Back Pain.
PLoS Med. 2016 May 17;13(5):e1002019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002019. eCollection 2016 May.
3
How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Jul 1;26(3):499-510. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7.
4
Validation and impact analysis of prognostic clinical prediction rules for low back pain is needed: a systematic review.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;68(7):821-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
6
Reliability of the Active-Knee-Extension and Straight-Leg-Raise Tests in Subjects With Flexibility Deficits.
J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Dec 3;24(4). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2014-0220. Print 2015 Nov 1.
10
A meta-analysis of core stability exercise versus general exercise for chronic low back pain.
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052082. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验