Perron Marc, Gendron Chantal, Langevin Pierre, Leblond Jean, Roos Marianne, Roy Jean-Sébastien
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Local 4445, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Valcartier Garison, Quebec City, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 2;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2022-x.
Low back pain (LBP) encompasses heterogeneous patients unlikely to respond to a unique treatment. Identifying sub-groups of LBP may help to improve treatment outcomes. This is a hypothesis-setting study designed to create a clinical prediction rule (CPR) that will predict favorable outcomes in soldiers with sub-acute and chronic LBP participating in a multi-station exercise program.
Military members with LBP participated in a supervised program comprising 7 stations each consisting of exercises of increasing difficulty. Demographic, impairment and disability data were collected at baseline. The modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was administered at baseline and following the 6-week program. An improvement of 50% in the initial ODI score was considered the reference standard to determine a favorable outcome. Univariate associations with favorable outcome were tested using chi-square or paired t-tests. Variables that showed between-group (favorable/unfavorable) differences were entered into a logistic regression after determining the sampling adequacy. Finally, continuous variables were dichotomized and the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios were determined for the model and for each variable.
A sample of 85 participants was included in analyses. Five variables contributed to prediction of a favorable outcome: no pain in lying down (p = 0.017), no use of antidepressants (p = 0.061), FABQ work score < 22.5 (p = 0.061), fewer than 5 physiotherapy sessions before entering the program (p = 0.144) and less than 6 months' work restriction (p = 0.161). This model yielded a sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.80, LR+ of 3.88, and LR- of 0.28. A 77.5% probability of favorable outcome can be predicted by the presence of more than three of the five variables, while an 80% probability of unfavorable outcome can be expected if only three or fewer variables are present.
The use of prognostic factors may guide clinicians in identifying soldiers with LBP most likely to have a favorable outcome. Further validation studies are needed to determine if the variables identified in our study are treatment effect modifiers that can predict success following participation in the multi-station exercise program.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03464877 registered retrospectively on 14 March 2018.
腰痛(LBP)患者情况各异,不太可能对单一治疗产生反应。识别腰痛亚组可能有助于改善治疗效果。这是一项假设设定研究,旨在创建一个临床预测规则(CPR),以预测参与多站式锻炼计划的亚急性和慢性腰痛士兵的良好治疗效果。
患有腰痛的军人参加了一个有监督的计划,该计划包括7个站点,每个站点的锻炼难度逐渐增加。在基线时收集人口统计学、损伤和残疾数据。在基线时和为期6周的计划结束后使用改良的奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)。初始ODI评分提高50%被视为确定良好治疗效果的参考标准。使用卡方检验或配对t检验来检验与良好治疗效果的单变量关联。在确定抽样充分性后,将显示组间(良好/不良)差异的变量纳入逻辑回归。最后,将连续变量进行二分法处理,并确定模型及每个变量的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比。
85名参与者的样本纳入分析。五个变量有助于预测良好的治疗效果:平躺时无疼痛(p = 0.017)、未使用抗抑郁药(p = 0.061)、FABQ工作评分<22.5(p = 0.061)、进入该计划前接受物理治疗的次数少于5次(p = 0.144)以及工作限制少于6个月(p = 0.161)。该模型的敏感性为0.78,特异性为0.80,阳性似然比为3.88,阴性似然比为0.28。如果存在五个变量中的三个以上,则可预测良好治疗效果的概率为77.5%,而如果只有三个或更少变量,则不良治疗效果的概率预计为80%。
使用预后因素可能会指导临床医生识别最有可能获得良好治疗效果的腰痛士兵。需要进一步的验证研究来确定我们研究中确定的变量是否为治疗效果修饰因素,能够预测参与多站式锻炼计划后的成功情况。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03464877,于2018年3月14日进行追溯注册。