Baillie Leyla, Bacon Catherine J, Hewitt Claire M, Moran Robert W
Osteopathy, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jan;23(1):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Several studies have investigated subgroups of patients with low back pain (LBP) most likely to benefit from Pilates or movement control exercises, but none have determined prognostic factors specifically for chronic LBP. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine predictors of change in disability in people with chronic LBP following a Pilates-based exercise programme and reports summarised integrated prediction statistics to aid clinical utility for determination of subgroups likely to benefit or not benefit from treatment.
Healthy adults (n = 55) with non-specific chronic LBP undertook a graded 6-week programme involving two 1-hour Pilates sessions/week (1 mat and 1 equipment-based) led in small groups by a trained Pilates instructor. Predictors of change in Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) were identified through regression analysis and used to develop clinical prediction statistics.
Clinically important improvement (n = 14 of 48 analysed) was predicted by four variables: gradual rather than sudden onset of LBP, PSFS <3.7 points, absence of aberrant motions on forward bending, and body mass index >24.5 kg/m. Presence of ≥3 improved probability of success from 29% to 73%. Failure to improve (n = 18) was predicted by three variables: sudden onset of low back pain, patient-specific functional score ≥3.7, and difference between left and right active straight leg raise >7°. Presence of all three increased probability of failure from 38% to 80%.
A combination of five, easily measured variables were able to predict disability outcome following a graded programme of Pilates-based exercises in people with chronic LBP. Two common movement deficits were inversely related to positive changes in function which may call into question the structural mechanism of improvements observed.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12616001588482.
多项研究调查了最有可能从普拉提或运动控制练习中获益的腰痛(LBP)患者亚组,但尚无研究确定慢性LBP的具体预后因素。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在确定慢性LBP患者在基于普拉提的运动计划后残疾变化的预测因素,并报告总结的综合预测统计数据,以辅助临床应用,确定可能从治疗中获益或未获益的亚组。
55名患有非特异性慢性LBP的健康成年人参加了一个为期6周的分级计划,该计划包括每周两次1小时的普拉提课程(1次垫上课程和1次器械课程),由一名训练有素的普拉提教练以小组形式授课。通过回归分析确定患者特定功能量表(PSFS)变化的预测因素,并用于制定临床预测统计数据。
四个变量可预测具有临床意义的改善(48例分析中有14例):腰痛逐渐发作而非突然发作、PSFS<3.7分、前屈时无异常动作以及体重指数>24.5kg/m²。存在≥3个因素可使成功概率从29%提高到73%。未改善(18例)由三个变量预测:腰痛突然发作、患者特定功能评分≥3.7以及左右主动直腿抬高差异>7°。存在所有三个因素可使失败概率从38%增加到80%。
五个易于测量的变量组合能够预测慢性LBP患者在基于普拉提的分级运动计划后的残疾结局。两种常见的运动缺陷与功能的积极变化呈负相关,这可能会对观察到的改善的结构机制提出质疑。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心:ACTRN12616001588482。