Nematbakhsh Mehdi, Mansouri Azam
Water and Electrolytes Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran.
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran.
Res Pharm Sci. 2018 Apr;13(2):177-180. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.223803.
Recently a cross talk between angiotensin 1-7 (Ang1-7) receptor (MasR) and angiotensin II receptors types 1 and 2 (AT1R and AT2R) has been highlighted. The effects of MasR antagonist (A779) compared to the vehicle on the renal blood flow (RBF) and renal vascular resistance (RVR) responses to Ang1-7 (300 ng/kg/min) infusion in the absence of Ang II receptors in male and female rats were determined at controlled renal perfusion pressure. Ang1-7 infusion did not alter mean arterial pressure in male and female rats. However, A779 compared to vehicle increased RBF (18% 3%) and decreased RVR (13% 4%) responses to Ang1-7 infusion significantly ( < 0.05) in male when AngII receptors were blocked. Such observation was not occurred in female animals. Finally it was concluded that renal vascular responses to Ang1-7 administration may not be exerted by MasR in male rats, and these responses are not mediated with AngII receptors.
最近,血管紧张素1-7(Ang1-7)受体(MasR)与1型和2型血管紧张素II受体(AT1R和AT2R)之间的相互作用受到了关注。在可控的肾灌注压力下,测定了在雄性和雌性大鼠中,与溶媒相比,MasR拮抗剂(A779)对肾血流量(RBF)和肾血管阻力(RVR)对Ang1-7(300 ng/kg/min)输注反应的影响,此时不存在Ang II受体。Ang1-7输注未改变雄性和雌性大鼠的平均动脉压。然而,在阻断AngII受体时,与溶媒相比,A779显著增加了雄性大鼠对Ang1-7输注的RBF(18% ± 3%)并降低了RVR(13% ± 4%)反应(P < 0.05)。在雌性动物中未出现这种观察结果。最后得出结论,在雄性大鼠中,对Ang1-7给药的肾血管反应可能不是由MasR介导的,并且这些反应不是由AngII受体介导的。