Williams Julian M, Greenslade Jaimi H, Chu Kevin H, Brown Anthony Ft, Lipman Jeffrey
Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Burns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Aug;30(4):538-546. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12947. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
To assess community-acquired pneumonia severity scores from two perspectives: (i) prediction of ICU admission or mortality; and (ii) utility of low scores for prediction of discharge within 48 h, potentially indicating suitability for short-stay unit admission.
Patients with community-acquired pneumonia were identified from a prospective database of emergency patients admitted with infection. Pneumonia severity index (PSI), CURB-65, CORB, CURXO, SMARTCOP scores and the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) minor criteria were calculated. Diagnostic accuracy statistics (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and area under receiver operating characteristic curves [AUROC]) were determined for both end-points.
Of 618 patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia judged eligible for invasive therapies, 75 (12.1%) were admitted to ICU or deceased at 30 days, and 87 (14.1%) were discharged within 48 h. All scores effectively stratified patients into categories of risk. For prediction of severe pneumonia, SMARTCOP, CURXO and IDSA/ATS discriminated well (AUROC 0.84-0.87). SMARTCOP and CURXO showed optimal sensitivity (85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 75-92]), while specificity was highest for CORB and CURB-65 (93% and 94%, respectively). Using lowest risk categories for prediction of discharge within 48 h, only SMARTCOP and CURXO showed specificity >80%. PSI demonstrated highest positive predictive value (31% [95% CI 24-39]) and AUROC (0.74 [95% CI 0.69-0.79]).
Community-acquired pneumonia severity scores had different strengths; SMARTCOP and CURXO were sensitive with potential to rule out severe disease, while the high specificity of CORB and CURB-65 facilitated identification of patients at high risk of requirement for ICU. Low severity scores were not useful to identify patients suitable for admission to short-stay units.
从两个角度评估社区获得性肺炎严重程度评分:(i)预测入住重症监护病房(ICU)或死亡情况;(ii)低分对预测48小时内出院的效用,这可能表明适合入住短期病房。
从因感染入院的急诊患者前瞻性数据库中识别出社区获得性肺炎患者。计算肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)、CURB-65、CORB、CURXO、SMARTCOP评分以及美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会(IDSA/ATS)次要标准。针对两个终点确定诊断准确性统计指标(敏感性、特异性、预测值、似然比和受试者操作特征曲线下面积[AUROC])。
在618例被判定适合进行有创治疗的社区获得性肺炎入院患者中,75例(12.1%)入住ICU或在30天内死亡,87例(14.1%)在48小时内出院。所有评分均有效地将患者分层为不同风险类别。对于预测重症肺炎,SMARTCOP、CURXO和IDSA/ATS的区分效果良好(AUROC为0.84 - 0.87)。SMARTCOP和CURXO显示出最佳敏感性(85%[95%置信区间(CI)75 - 92]),而CORB和CURB-65的特异性最高(分别为93%和94%)。使用最低风险类别预测48小时内出院,只有SMARTCOP和CURXO的特异性>80%。PSI显示出最高的阳性预测值(31%[95%CI 24 - 39])和AUROC(0.74[95%CI 0.69 - 0.79])。
社区获得性肺炎严重程度评分各有优势;SMARTCOP和CURXO敏感,有排除重症疾病的潜力,而CORB和CURB-65的高特异性有助于识别有入住ICU高风险的患者。低严重程度评分对于识别适合入住短期病房的患者并无用处。