Complementary & Integrative Surgery Service, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, 47 Golomb Street, Haifa 31048, Israel; School of Public Health, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Complementary & Integrative Surgery Service, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, 47 Golomb Street, Haifa 31048, Israel; Internal Medicine Department, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Bnai Zion Medical Center, 47 Golomb Street, Haifa 31048, Israel.
Complement Ther Med. 2018 Apr;37:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
The integration of manual therapies, including reflexology, into conventional care settings is growing extensively. Patients' beliefs, attitudes and expectations toward these therapies interact with their outcomes, but currently there are no validated tools to evaluate these factors. We aimed to design and to validate such a tool specifically targeted into reflexology.
Following input of a multidisciplinary team of experts, the self-administered Inpatient Beliefs, Expectations and Attitudes toward Reflexology (IBEAR) questionnaire was constructed, containing 25 items, 8 referring to demographics and 17 specifically addressing reflexology. Cronbach's alpha was computed to evaluate the questionnaire's internal reliability, and factor analysis was used for further validation (232 patients). Pearson coefficient and Kappa tests were used to test and retest (within 48 hours) the questionnaire on a group of 199 patients, to assure clarity and reliability.
For the 232 questionnaires collected, the computed Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.716 (acceptable reliability). Factor analysis pointed to two content areas separated into four items addressing attitudes and expectations and five items focusing on beliefs and attitudes. In the test-retest stage, 199 participants filled in the questionnaire for a second time. The Pearson coefficient for all questions ranged between 0.73 and 0.94 (good to excellent correlation) and Kappa scores ranged between 0.66 and 1.0 (moderate to high reliability). Consequently, one of the questions was removed from the IBEAR.
The present study provides evidence that the proposed IBEAR questionnaire with 16 items is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of inpatients' beliefs, expectations and attitudes toward reflexology.
包括反射疗法在内的手动疗法在常规治疗环境中的整合正在广泛扩展。患者对这些疗法的信念、态度和期望与其结果相互作用,但目前尚无经过验证的工具来评估这些因素。我们旨在设计并验证一种专门针对反射疗法的工具。
在一个多学科专家团队的输入下,我们构建了一个可自行管理的反射疗法住院患者信念、期望和态度问卷(IBEAR),其中包含 25 个项目,8 个项目涉及人口统计学,17 个项目专门针对反射疗法。我们计算了克朗巴赫 α系数来评估问卷的内部可靠性,并使用因子分析进行进一步验证(232 名患者)。我们使用皮尔逊系数和 Kappa 检验在 199 名患者中进行了测试和重测(48 小时内),以确保问卷的清晰性和可靠性。
对于收集的 232 份问卷,计算得出的克朗巴赫 α系数为 0.716(可接受的可靠性)。因子分析指出了两个内容领域,分为四个项目用于评估态度和期望,以及五个项目关注信念和态度。在测试-重测阶段,199 名参与者第二次填写问卷。所有问题的 Pearson 系数在 0.73 到 0.94 之间(良好到极好的相关性),Kappa 分数在 0.66 到 1.0 之间(中度到高度可靠性)。因此,问卷中的一个问题被删除。
本研究表明,包含 16 个项目的 IBEAR 问卷是评估住院患者对反射疗法的信念、期望和态度的有效且可靠的工具。