Center for Adaptation to a Changing Environment (ACE), ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
ESI & CEC, Biosciences, University of Exeter, TR10 9FE, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Evolution. 2018 May;72(5):1165-1173. doi: 10.1111/evo.13479. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
Many organisms-notably microbes-are embedded within complex communities where cooperative behaviors in the form of excreted public goods can benefit other species. Under such circumstances, intraspecific interactions are likely to be less important in driving the evolution of cooperation. We first illustrate this idea with a simple theoretical model, showing that relatedness-the extent to which individuals with the same cooperative alleles interact with each other-has a reduced impact on the evolution of cooperation when public goods are shared between species. We test this empirically using strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that vary in their production of metal-chelating siderophores in copper contaminated compost (an interspecific public good). We show that nonsiderophore producers grow poorly relative to producers under high relatedness, but this cost can be alleviated by the presence of the isogenic producer (low relatedness) and/or the compost microbial community. Hence, relatedness can become unimportant when public goods provide interspecific benefits.
许多生物,尤其是微生物,都存在于复杂的群落中,这些群落中以分泌公共物品形式表现出的合作行为可以使其他物种受益。在这种情况下,种内相互作用在推动合作进化方面的重要性可能较低。我们首先用一个简单的理论模型来说明这一观点,表明当公共物品在物种之间共享时,亲缘关系(具有相同合作等位基因的个体相互作用的程度)对合作进化的影响会降低。我们使用在铜污染堆肥中产生不同金属螯合载体(一种种间公共物品)的铜绿假单胞菌菌株来对此进行实证检验。我们表明,与高亲缘关系下的载体生产者相比,非载体生产者的生长情况较差,但这种成本可以通过同基因生产者(低亲缘关系)和/或堆肥微生物群落的存在而得到缓解。因此,当公共物品提供种间利益时,亲缘关系可能变得不重要。