Choi Seung Yong, Lee Youlim, Kim Mirinae, Park Young Hoon
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Catholic Institute for Visual Science, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;32(2):126-133. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0092. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
To investigate the outcomes of scleral buckling surgery performed under a slit-lamp illumination system (Visulux) with a contact wide-angle viewing lens (Mini Quad) in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to compare these outcomes with those of surgery performed under an indirect ophthalmoscope.
By retrospective review of electronic medical records, patients with RRD who had undergone scleral buckling surgery were identified. Scleral buckling surgeries were performed with two illumination instruments, a slit-lamp (SL group) and an indirect ophthalmoscope (IO group). Subretinal fluid drainage, cryopexy, and intravitreal gas injection were performed optionally. At 6 months after surgery, anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Operation time was also compared between the two groups.
Of the 45 total patients (45 eyes), 28 were included in the SL group, and 17 were included in the IO group. In the SL and IO groups, the primary anatomical success rate was 89.3% and 88.2%, respectively (p = 0.92). The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution change, which reflects improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after surgery, was -0.19 ± 0.38 in the SL group and -0.21 ± 0.63 in the IO group; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.91). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the SL group (78.9 ± 11.8 minutes) than in the IO group (100.0 ± 13.9 minutes, p < 0.001), especially for patients who underwent additional procedures such as subretinal fluid drainage and cryopexy (81.4 ± 12.9 and 103.5 ± 12.3 minutes, respectively, p < 0.001).
Scleral buckling surgery performed under a slit-lamp illumination system yielded a similar anatomical success rate and similar functional improvement in RRD compared with surgery performed under an indirect ophthalmoscope. The slit-lamp system could save time, especially in bullous RRD, which requires additional subretinal fluid drainage.
探讨在裂隙灯照明系统(Visulux)下使用接触式广角观察镜(Mini Quad)对孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)患者进行巩膜扣带术的效果,并将这些效果与在间接检眼镜下进行的手术效果进行比较。
通过回顾电子病历,确定接受巩膜扣带术的RRD患者。巩膜扣带术使用两种照明器械进行,即裂隙灯(SL组)和间接检眼镜(IO组)。视情况进行视网膜下液引流、冷冻治疗和玻璃体腔内气体注射。术后6个月,评估并比较两组的解剖和功能结果。还比较了两组的手术时间。
45例患者(45只眼)中,28例纳入SL组,17例纳入IO组。SL组和IO组的主要解剖成功率分别为89.3%和88.2%(p = 0.92)。反映术后最佳矫正视力改善情况的最小分辨角变化对数,SL组为-0.19±0.38,IO组为-0.21±0.63;差异无统计学意义(p = 0.91)。SL组的平均手术时间(78.9±11.8分钟)明显短于IO组(100.0±13.9分钟,p < 0.001),尤其是对于接受视网膜下液引流和冷冻治疗等额外手术的患者(分别为81.4±12.9和103.5±12.3分钟,p < 0.001)。
与在间接检眼镜下进行的手术相比,在裂隙灯照明系统下进行的巩膜扣带术在RRD患者中具有相似的解剖成功率和相似的功能改善。裂隙灯系统可以节省时间,特别是在需要额外视网膜下液引流的大泡性RRD中。