American Society for Microbiology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May;98(5):1427-1434. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0809. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
Defining the optimal diagnostic tools for evaluating onchocerciasis elimination efforts in areas co-endemic for other filarial nematodes is imperative. This study compared three published polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods: the -specific qPCR-O150, the pan-filarial qPCR melt curve analysis (MCA), and the O150-PCR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) currently used for vector surveillance in skin snip biopsies (skin snips) collected from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The pan-filarial qPCR-MCA was compared with species-specific qPCRs for and . Among the 471 skin snips, 47.5%, 43.5%, and 27.0% were positive by qPCR-O150, qPCR-MCA, and O150-PCR ELISA, respectively. Using qPCR-O150 as the comparator, the sensitivity and specificity of qPCR-MCA were 89.3% and 98.0%, respectively, whereas for O150-PCR ELISA, they were 56.7% and 100%, respectively. Although qPCR-MCA identified the presence of and spp. in skin snips, species-specific qPCRs had greater sensitivity and were needed to identify . Most of the qPCR-MCA misclassifications occurred in mixed infections. The reduced sensitivity of O150-PCR ELISA was associated with lower microfilaria burden and with lower amounts of DNA. Although qPCR-MCA identified most of the -positive skin snips, it is not sufficiently robust to be used for stop-mass drug administration (MDA) evaluations in areas co-endemic for other filariae. Because O150-PCR ELISA missed 43.3% of qPCR-O150-positive skin snips, the qPCR-O150 assay is more appropriate for evaluating skin snips of OV-16 + children in stop-MDA assessments. Although improving the sensitivity of the O150-PCR ELISA as an alternative to qPCR might be possible, qPCR-O150 offers distinct advantages aside from increased sensitivity.
确定评估在其他丝虫病流行地区消灭盘尾丝虫病工作的最佳诊断工具至关重要。本研究比较了三种已发表的聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法:针对 O150 的 qPCR、泛丝虫 qPCR 熔解曲线分析(MCA)和目前用于在刚果民主共和国采集的皮肤活检样本(皮肤切片)中进行媒介监测的 O150-PCR 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)。泛丝虫 qPCR-MCA 与 和 特异性 qPCR 进行了比较。在 471 个皮肤切片中,qPCR-O150、qPCR-MCA 和 O150-PCR ELISA 分别检测到 47.5%、43.5%和 27.0%为 阳性。以 qPCR-O150 为对照,qPCR-MCA 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 89.3%和 98.0%,而 O150-PCR ELISA 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 56.7%和 100%。虽然 qPCR-MCA 可在皮肤切片中检测到 和 种的存在,但特异性 qPCR 具有更高的灵敏度,需要用来鉴定 。大多数 qPCR-MCA 的错误分类发生在混合感染中。O150-PCR ELISA 灵敏度降低与微丝蚴负荷较低和 量较低有关。虽然 qPCR-MCA 可识别大多数 阳性皮肤切片,但它不够稳健,不能用于在其他丝虫病流行地区进行停止大规模药物治疗(MDA)评估。由于 O150-PCR ELISA 错过了 43.3%的 qPCR-O150 阳性皮肤切片,因此 qPCR-O150 检测更适合用于评估 OV-16+儿童的皮肤切片停止 MDA 评估。虽然提高 O150-PCR ELISA 的灵敏度作为 qPCR 的替代方法是可能的,但 qPCR-O150 除了具有更高的灵敏度外,还有明显的优势。