Wang Chong, Pors Susanne Elisabeth, Bojesen Anders Miki
A Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
B Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Avian Dis. 2018 Jun;62(2):195-200. doi: 10.1637/11809-020818-Reg.1. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
To assess the survival of Gallibacterium anatis in dead laying hens, 21-wk-old laying hens were injected intraperitoneally with 0.5 ml brain hearth infusion broth containing 10 colony-forming units (CFU) of G. anatis 12656-12 liver ( n = 16), Escherichia coli ST141 ( n = 16), or a mix of G. anatis 12656-12 liver and E. coli ST141 ( n = 16), respectively. Birds were euthanatized 24 hr post injection. From each group eight dead birds were kept at 4 C and eight at room temperature. Swab samples were taken at different time points post euthanatization and streaked on blood agar plates. From the birds kept at 4 C, G. anatis was reisolated from the G. anatis and the G. anatis- E. coli co-injected groups at least 12 days post euthanization. From birds kept at room temperature, G. anatis was reisolated up to 2 days post euthanatization. When using the gyrB-based G. anatis-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR), G. anatis was detected within at least 5 days, and up to 5 days post euthanatization, from birds kept at room temperature and 4 C, respectively. Escherichia coli was reisolated from all the time points independent of how the birds were kept. No difference was observed between the reisolation rates for G. anatis or E. coli when comparing similar detection methods. For birds kept at 4 C, bacterial cultivation was a more sensitive method for detecting G. anatis ( P < 0.05), whereas for birds kept at room temperature, the G. anatis-specific qPCR outperformed bacterial culture ( P < 0.05). In conclusion, we demonstrated that G. anatis has a poorer survival rate than does E. coli in dead chickens kept at room temperature. That finding may affect the overall diagnostic sensitivity and lead to underdiagnosis of G. anatis in a normal production setting.
为评估产蛋母鸡死亡后鸭疫里默氏杆菌(Gallibacterium anatis)的存活情况,将21周龄的产蛋母鸡分别腹腔注射0.5毫升脑心浸液肉汤,其中含有10个鸭疫里默氏杆菌12656 - 12肝脏菌株的菌落形成单位(CFU)(n = 16)、大肠杆菌ST141(n = 16)或鸭疫里默氏杆菌12656 - 12肝脏菌株与大肠杆菌ST141的混合物(n = 16)。注射后24小时对鸡实施安乐死。每组中8只死鸡置于4℃,8只置于室温。安乐死后在不同时间点采集拭子样本,并划线接种于血琼脂平板上。对于置于4℃的鸡,在安乐死后至少12天,从鸭疫里默氏杆菌组和鸭疫里默氏杆菌与大肠杆菌共注射组中重新分离出了鸭疫里默氏杆菌。对于置于室温的鸡,在安乐死后长达2天重新分离出了鸭疫里默氏杆菌。当使用基于gyrB的鸭疫里默氏杆菌特异性定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)时,分别从置于室温及4℃的鸡中,在安乐死后至少5天及长达5天检测到了鸭疫里默氏杆菌。在所有时间点均重新分离出了大肠杆菌,与鸡的保存方式无关。比较相似检测方法时,鸭疫里默氏杆菌或大肠杆菌的重新分离率未观察到差异。对于置于4℃的鸡,细菌培养是检测鸭疫里默氏杆菌更敏感的方法(P < 0.05),而对于置于室温的鸡,鸭疫里默氏杆菌特异性qPCR比细菌培养表现更好(P < 0.05)。总之,我们证明在室温保存的死鸡中,鸭疫里默氏杆菌的存活率比大肠杆菌低。这一发现可能会影响总体诊断敏感性,并导致在正常生产环境中鸭疫里默氏杆菌的诊断不足。