• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过可持续修复性司法框架拓展生殖正义:以南非堕胎为例

Expanding reproductive justice through a supportability reparative justice framework: the case of abortion in South Africa.

作者信息

Macleod Catriona Ida

机构信息

a Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction, Department of Psychology , Rhodes University , Grahamstown , South Africa.

出版信息

Cult Health Sex. 2019 Jan;21(1):46-62. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1447687. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1080/13691058.2018.1447687
PMID:29613849
Abstract

Theoretical refinement of the concept of reproductive justice has been called for. In this paper, I propose the use of a supportability reparative justice approach. Drawing on intra-categorical intersectionality, the supportability aspect starts from the event of a pregnancy to unravel the interwoven embodied and social realities implicated in women experiencing pregnancy as personally supportable/unsupportable, and socially supported/unsupported. The reparative justice aspect highlights the need for social repair in the case of unsupportable pregnancies and relies on Ernesto Verdeja's critical theory of reparative justice in which he outlines four reparative dimensions. Using abortion within the South African context, I show how this framework may be put to use: (1) the facilitation of autonomous decision-making (individual material dimension) requires understanding women within context, and less emphasis on individual-driven 'choice'; (2) the provision of legal, safe state-sponsored healthcare resources (collective material dimension) demands political will and abortion service provision to be regarded as a moral as well as a healthcare priority; (3) overcoming stigma and the spoiled identities (collective symbolic dimension) requires significant feminist action to deconstruct negative discourses and to foreground positive narratives; and (4) understanding individual lived experiences (individual symbolic dimension) means deep listening within the social dynamics of particular contexts.

摘要

人们呼吁对生殖正义的概念进行理论完善。在本文中,我提议采用一种可支持性修复正义的方法。基于范畴内的交叉性,可支持性方面从怀孕事件出发,去揭示女性在经历怀孕时所涉及的交织在一起的身体和社会现实,即个人层面上是否可获得支持以及社会层面上是否得到支持。修复正义方面强调在不可支持的怀孕情况下进行社会修复的必要性,并依赖于埃内斯托·韦尔迪哈的修复正义批判理论,他在该理论中概述了四个修复维度。以南非背景下的堕胎为例,我展示了这个框架如何得以应用:(1)促进自主决策(个体物质维度)需要在具体情境中理解女性,减少对个体驱动的“选择”的强调;(2)提供合法、安全的国家资助的医疗资源(集体物质维度)要求有政治意愿,并且将堕胎服务的提供视为道德以及医疗保健方面的优先事项;(3)克服耻辱感和受损身份(集体象征维度)需要大量的女权主义行动来解构负面话语并突出正面叙事;(4)理解个体的生活经历(个体象征维度)意味着在特定情境的社会动态中进行深入倾听。

相似文献

1
Expanding reproductive justice through a supportability reparative justice framework: the case of abortion in South Africa.通过可持续修复性司法框架拓展生殖正义:以南非堕胎为例
Cult Health Sex. 2019 Jan;21(1):46-62. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1447687. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
Articulating reproductive justice through reparative justice: case studies of abortion in Great Britain and South Africa.通过恢复性司法阐明生殖正义:英国和南非的堕胎案例研究
Cult Health Sex. 2017 May;19(5):601-615. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1257738. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
3
The Role of Reproductive Justice Movements in Challenging South Korea's Abortion Ban.生殖正义运动在挑战韩国堕胎禁令中的作用。
Health Hum Rights. 2019 Dec;21(2):97-107.
4
Reproductive Rights or Reproductive Justice? Lessons from Argentina.生殖权利还是生殖正义?来自阿根廷的经验教训。
Health Hum Rights. 2015 Jun 11;17(1):E136-47.
5
Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.选择实质正义:关于“选择”“权利”与新生殖技术的讨论
Wis Womens Law J. 1997 Summer;11(3):431-41.
6
Men and talk about legal abortion in South Africa: equality, support and rights discourses undermining reproductive 'choice'.南非的男性与堕胎合法化:平等、支持和权利话语对生殖“选择权”的破坏。
Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(8):997-1010. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2013.802815. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Human rights dynamics of abortion law reform.堕胎法改革中的人权动态
Hum Rights Q. 2003 Feb;25(1):1-59. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2003.0003.
8
Degendering reproduction?生殖去性别化?
Med Law Rev. 2008 Autumn;16(3):346-68. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwn016. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
9
Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?健康权是性别平等的必要前提条件吗?
Rev Law Soc Change. 2011;35(1):131-93.
10
Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!堕胎权判决:一线希望!
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Jul-Sep;2(3):180-183. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.044.

引用本文的文献

1
The concept of intersectionality in bioethics: a systematic review.生物伦理学中的交叉性概念:系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 23;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01057-5.
2
Prevalence and factors associated with adolescent pregnancies in Zambia: a systematic review from 2000-2022.赞比亚青少年怀孕的患病率及相关因素:2000年至2022年的系统综述
Arch Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;81(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01045-y.
3
The impact of COVID-19 on safe abortion access in Africa: An analysis through a framework of reproductive justice and lens of structural violence.
新冠疫情对非洲安全堕胎服务可及性的影响:基于生殖正义框架与结构性暴力视角的分析
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Sep 23;3:958710. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.958710. eCollection 2022.
4
Application of community dialogue approach to prevent adolescent pregnancy, early marriage and school dropout in Zambia: a case study.社区对话方法在赞比亚预防青少年怀孕、早婚和辍学中的应用:案例研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01335-8.