Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thromb Haemost. 2018 May;118(5):873-882. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641565. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
The tendency of a plasma sample to generate thrombin, a central enzyme in blood coagulation, might be an important indicator of prothrombotic risk linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the presence of platelets may be a critical determinant. Clinical data, laboratory markers and thrombin generation (TG), investigated in both platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-free plasma (PFP) at 1 pM TF, were available in 407 individuals from the Gutenberg Health Study. Given the well-known effect of anticoagulants on TG, subjects taking anticoagulants ( = 15) have been excluded resulting in 392 subjects for further analysis. Lag time, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak height were the investigated parameters of a TG curve. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify TG determinants. Mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet count were both negatively associated to lag time and positively to peak height (MPV, β:6.35 [2.66; 10.0]; platelet count, β:0.111 [0.054; 0.169]) in PRP only. C-reactive protein was positively associated with lag time and ETP in both PRP and PFP, with a stronger effect on ETP in PRP (PRP, β:76.7 [47.5; 106]; PFP, β:34.8 [10.3; 59.2]). After adjustment for fibrinogen, the relation between CRP and ETP was attenuated in PRP and PFP. Of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs), obesity was positively associated to TG in PRP only. Our findings support that TG, particularly in PRP, relates to traditional CVRFs in a representative sample from a population-based study. Assessment of procoagulant activity in a platelet-dependent manner by TG is a promising tool for assessing individual risk for CVD.
血浆样本生成凝血酶的趋势,凝血酶是血液凝固的核心酶,可能是与心血管疾病(CVD)相关的促血栓形成风险的重要指标,但血小板的存在可能是一个关键决定因素。在 407 名来自古滕贝格健康研究的个体中,可获得富含血小板的血浆(PRP)和无血小板血浆(PFP)中 1pM TF 下的临床数据、实验室标志物和凝血酶生成(TG)。鉴于抗凝剂对 TG 的明显影响,排除了正在服用抗凝剂的受试者(=15),进一步分析了 392 名受试者。TG 曲线的研究参数为滞后时间、内源性凝血酶潜能(ETP)和峰值高度。多变量线性回归分析用于确定 TG 的决定因素。只有在 PRP 中,平均血小板体积(MPV)和血小板计数均与滞后时间呈负相关,与峰值高度呈正相关(MPV,β:6.35[2.66;10.0];血小板计数,β:0.111[0.054;0.169])。C 反应蛋白与 PRP 和 PFP 中的滞后时间和 ETP 均呈正相关,在 PRP 中对 ETP 的影响更强(PRP,β:76.7[47.5;106];PFP,β:34.8[10.3;59.2])。调整纤维蛋白原后,PRP 和 PFP 中 CRP 与 ETP 的关系减弱。在传统心血管危险因素(CVRFs)中,肥胖仅与 PRP 中的 TG 呈正相关。我们的研究结果支持,在基于人群的研究的代表性样本中,TG 特别是在 PRP 中,与传统的 CVRFs 相关。通过 TG 以依赖血小板的方式评估促凝血活性是评估 CVD 个体风险的有前途的工具。