1 College of Korean Medicine, Kyung-Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2 East-West Cancer Center, Dunsan Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Sep;17(3):619-627. doi: 10.1177/1534735417753542. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
Stomach cancer, historically, has a low survival rate advances in curative resection procedures.
To assess the potential benefits of traditional herbal medicines in conjunction with chemotherapy in postoperative gastric cancer patients in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, a Chinese database (CNKI), a Korean database, a Japanese database, AMED, and CINAHL up to September 2016. We summarized survival data from all RCTs.
All RCTs of oral traditional medicines for resectable gastric cancer compared with chemotherapy alone were eligible.
Thirteen eligible trials with survival data (1075 patients) were deemed eligible for inclusion.
There were 217 documented deaths of the 574 patients assigned to adjuvant traditional medicines groups and 319 documented deaths of the 501 patients assigned to the chemotherapy-only groups. Adjuvant traditional medicines were associated with a statistically significant benefit in terms of overall survival rate (hazard ratio = 0.56; 95% confidence interval = 0.47-0.66; P < .00001) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval = 0.43-0.66; P < .00001).
Among the RCTs included, the inclusion of postoperative adjuvant traditional medicines was associated with reduced risk of death in gastric cancer patients, when survival rates were compared with the group of patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, most of the included studies utilized are thought to be of low quality, so it would certainly appear that more trials are both advisable and necessary to arrive at correct and convincing conclusions.
胃癌的历史生存率较低,得益于治疗性切除术的进步。
评估传统草药与化疗联合应用于术后胃癌患者在总生存和无病生存方面的潜在益处。
我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国数据库(CNKI)、韩国数据库、日本数据库、AMED 和 CINAHL,检索截至 2016 年 9 月。我们汇总了所有 RCT 的生存数据。
所有关于可切除胃癌的口服传统药物与单独化疗比较的 RCT 均符合纳入标准。
有 13 项符合纳入标准的 RCT 具有生存数据(共 1075 例患者)。
在接受辅助传统药物治疗的 574 例患者中,有 217 例患者记录到死亡,在接受单纯化疗的 501 例患者中,有 319 例患者记录到死亡。辅助传统药物治疗与总生存率(风险比=0.56;95%置信区间=0.47-0.66;P<0.00001)和无病生存率(风险比=0.54;95%置信区间=0.43-0.66;P<0.00001)均具有统计学显著获益。
在纳入的 RCT 中,与单纯接受化疗的患者相比,术后辅助使用传统药物治疗与胃癌患者的死亡风险降低相关,当生存率进行比较时。然而,大多数纳入的研究被认为质量较低,因此显然需要更多的试验来得出正确和令人信服的结论。