• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水质、卫生设施、洗手及营养干预对肯尼亚农村儿童发育的影响(肯尼亚水、卫生与健康促进项目):一项整群随机对照试验

Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on child development in rural Kenya (WASH Benefits Kenya): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Stewart Christine P, Kariger Patricia, Fernald Lia, Pickering Amy J, Arnold Charles D, Arnold Benjamin F, Hubbard Alan E, Dentz Holly N, Lin Audrie, Meerkerk Theodora J, Milner Erin, Swarthout Jenna, Colford John M, Null Clair

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

School of Public Health, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;2(4):269-280. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30025-7.

DOI:10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30025-7
PMID:29616236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859215/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor nutrition and infectious diseases can prevent children from reaching their developmental potential. We aimed to assess the effects of improvements in water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition on early child development in rural Kenya.

METHODS

In this cluster-randomised controlled trial, we enrolled pregnant women in their second or third trimester from three counties (Kakamega, Bungoma, and Vihiga) in Kenya's western region, with an average of 12 households per cluster. Groups of nine geographically adjacent clusters were block-randomised, using a random number generator, into the six intervention groups (including monthly visits to promote target behaviours), a passive control group (no visits), or a double-sized active control group (monthly household visits to measure child mid-upper arm circumference). The six intervention groups were: chlorinated drinking water; improved sanitation; handwashing with soap; combined water, sanitation, and handwashing; improved nutrition through counselling and provision of lipid-based nutrient supplements; and combined water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition. Here we report on the prespecified secondary child development outcomes: gross motor milestone achievement assessed with the WHO module at year 1, and communication, gross motor, personal social, and combined scores measured by the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (EASQ) at year 2. Masking of participants was not possible, but data assessors were masked. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704105.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 27, 2012, and May 21, 2014, 8246 women residing in 702 clusters were enrolled. No clusters were lost to follow-up, but 2212 households with 2279 children were lost to follow-up by year 2. 5791 (69%) children were measured at year 1 and 6107 (73%) at year 2. At year 1, compared with the active control group, the combined water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition group had greater rates of attaining the standing with assistance milestone (hazard ratio 1·23, 95% CI 1·09-1·40) and the walking with assistance milestone (1·32, 1·17-1·50), and the handwashing group had a greater rate of attaining the standing alone milestone (1·15, 1·01-1·31). There were no differences when comparing the other intervention groups with the active control group on any of the motor milestone measures at year 1. At year 2, there were no differences among groups for the communication, gross motor, personal social, or combined EASQ scores.

INTERPRETATION

The handwashing and combined water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition interventions might have improved child motor development after 1 year, although after 2 years there were no other differences between groups. Future research should examine ways to make community health and nutrition programmes more effective at supporting child development.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

摘要

背景

营养不良和传染病会阻碍儿童发挥其发育潜能。我们旨在评估改善水、环境卫生、洗手和营养状况对肯尼亚农村地区儿童早期发育的影响。

方法

在这项整群随机对照试验中,我们招募了肯尼亚西部地区三个县(卡卡梅加、邦戈马和维希加)妊娠中期或晚期的孕妇,每个整群平均有12户家庭。使用随机数字生成器将九个地理相邻的整群组进行区组随机分组,分为六个干预组(包括每月进行家访以促进目标行为)、一个被动对照组(无家访)或一个双倍规模的主动对照组(每月进行家访以测量儿童的中上臂围)。六个干预组分别为:氯化饮用水;改善环境卫生;用肥皂洗手;水、环境卫生和洗手综合措施;通过咨询和提供基于脂质的营养补充剂改善营养;水、环境卫生、洗手和营养综合措施。在此,我们报告预先设定的儿童发育次要结局:1岁时使用世界卫生组织模块评估的大运动里程碑达成情况,以及2岁时通过扩展年龄与阶段问卷(EASQ)测量的沟通、大运动、个人社交和综合得分。无法对参与者进行设盲,但对数据评估者进行了设盲。分析采用意向性分析。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01704105。

结果

2012年11月27日至2014年5月21日期间,702个整群中的8246名妇女入组。无整群失访,但到第2年时,有2212户家庭(含2279名儿童)失访。1岁时对5791名(69%)儿童进行了测量,2岁时对6107名(73%)儿童进行了测量。1岁时,与主动对照组相比,水、环境卫生、洗手和营养综合措施组达到在帮助下站立里程碑(风险比1.23,95%置信区间1.09 - 1.40)和在帮助下行走里程碑(1.32,1.17 - 1.50)的比例更高,洗手组达到独自站立里程碑的比例更高(1.15,1.01 - 1.31)。在1岁时的任何大运动里程碑测量中,将其他干预组与主动对照组进行比较时均无差异。2岁时,各干预组在沟通、大运动、个人社交或EASQ综合得分方面无差异。

解读

洗手以及水、环境卫生、洗手和营养综合措施干预可能在1年后改善了儿童的运动发育,尽管2年后各干预组之间没有其他差异。未来的研究应探讨如何使社区卫生和营养项目在支持儿童发育方面更有效。

资金来源

比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987f/5859215/69b9e8cee3ee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987f/5859215/81c36ba458c2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987f/5859215/69b9e8cee3ee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987f/5859215/81c36ba458c2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/987f/5859215/69b9e8cee3ee/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on child development in rural Kenya (WASH Benefits Kenya): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.水质、卫生设施、洗手及营养干预对肯尼亚农村儿童发育的影响(肯尼亚水、卫生与健康促进项目):一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;2(4):269-280. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30025-7.
2
Effect of water quality, sanitation, hand washing, and nutritional interventions on child development in rural Bangladesh (WASH Benefits Bangladesh): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、洗手及营养干预措施对孟加拉国农村地区儿童发育的影响(孟加拉国水、环境卫生与个人卫生促进项目):一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;2(4):255-268. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30031-2.
3
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预措施对肯尼亚农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e316-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30005-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
4
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预对孟加拉国农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e302-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30490-4. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Effects of single and integrated water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition interventions on child soil-transmitted helminth and Giardia infections: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Kenya.单一和综合水、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预措施对儿童土壤传播性蠕虫和贾第虫感染的影响:肯尼亚农村的一项整群随机对照试验
PLoS Med. 2019 Jun 26;16(6):e1002841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002841. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Effects of Individual and Combined Water, Sanitation, Handwashing, and Nutritional Interventions on Child Respiratory Infections in Rural Kenya: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.个体和综合水、环境卫生、手卫生以及营养干预措施对肯尼亚农村儿童呼吸道感染的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jun;102(6):1286-1295. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0779.
7
Cluster-randomised controlled trials of individual and combined water, sanitation, hygiene and nutritional interventions in rural Bangladesh and Kenya: the WASH Benefits study design and rationale.孟加拉国和肯尼亚农村地区个体与联合水、环境卫生和营养干预措施的群组随机对照试验:WASH 效益研究的设计与原理。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 30;3(8):e003476. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003476.
8
Effects of water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on telomere length among children in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村一项群组随机对照试验中,水、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预措施对儿童端粒长度的影响。
Elife. 2017 Oct 5;6:e29365. doi: 10.7554/eLife.29365.
9
Independent and combined effects of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene, and improved complementary feeding, on child stunting and anaemia in rural Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial.改善水、环境卫生和个人卫生以及改善补充喂养对津巴布韦农村儿童发育迟缓与贫血的独立和联合影响:一项群组随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e132-e147. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30374-7.
10
Achieving optimal technology and behavioral uptake of single and combined interventions of water, sanitation hygiene and nutrition, in an efficacy trial (WASH benefits) in rural Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村进行的一项效果试验(水、环境卫生与个人卫生促进项目)中,实现水、环境卫生、个人卫生和营养单一及联合干预措施的最佳技术应用和行为改变。
Trials. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2710-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated child nutrition, parenting, and health intervention in rural Liberia: A mixed-methods feasibility study.利比里亚农村地区儿童营养、育儿与健康综合干预:一项混合方法可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 13;19(12):e0311486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311486. eCollection 2024.
2
Addressing Fecal Contamination in Rural Kenyan Households: The Roles of Environmental Interventions and Animal Ownership.解决肯尼亚农村家庭的粪便污染问题:环境干预和动物所有权的作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 4;58(22):9500-9514. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09419. Epub 2024 May 17.
3
Geographic pair matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of water quality, sanitation, hand washing, and nutritional interventions on child development in rural Bangladesh (WASH Benefits Bangladesh): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、洗手及营养干预措施对孟加拉国农村地区儿童发育的影响(孟加拉国水、环境卫生与个人卫生促进项目):一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;2(4):255-268. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30031-2.
2
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预措施对肯尼亚农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e316-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30005-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
3
大规模整群随机试验中的地理配对匹配
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 5;15(1):1069. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45152-y.
4
Risk Factors for Enteric Pathogen Exposure among Children in Black Belt Region of Alabama, USA.美国亚拉巴马州黑带地区儿童肠病原体暴露的风险因素。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2023 Dec;29(12):2433-41. doi: 10.3201/eid2912.230780.
5
Principled Subpopulation Analysis of the BetterBirth Study and the Impact of WHO's Safe Childbirth Checklist Intervention.基于原则的 BetterBirth 研究亚组分析及世卫组织安全分娩核对表干预的影响
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:1042-1051. eCollection 2022.
6
Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.促进低收入和中等收入国家采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)技术的干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;17(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1194. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire Inventory and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区年龄与阶段问卷与贝利婴幼儿发育量表的同时效度。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Mar 1;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03800-6.
8
Effect of a Child-Owned Poultry Intervention Providing Eggs on Nutrition Status and Motor Skills of Young Children in Southern Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized and Controlled Community Trial.儿童拥有家禽干预提供鸡蛋对埃塞俄比亚南部幼儿营养状况和运动技能的影响:一项整群随机对照社区试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;19(22):15305. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215305.
9
Effectiveness of a home-environmental intervention package and an early child development intervention on child health and development in high-altitude rural communities in the Peruvian Andes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.高海拔安第斯农村社区家庭环境干预包和早期儿童发展干预对儿童健康和发育的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 6;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00985-x.
10
Evaluating the robustness of targeted maximum likelihood estimators via realistic simulations in nutrition intervention trials.通过营养干预试验中的现实模拟评估靶向极大似然估计量的稳健性。
Stat Med. 2022 May 30;41(12):2132-2165. doi: 10.1002/sim.9348. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预对孟加拉国农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e302-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30490-4. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
4
Home fortification during the first 1000 d improves child development in Bangladesh: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial.在孟加拉国,1000天内的家庭强化营养改善儿童发育:一项整群随机有效性试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;105(4):958-969. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.150318. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Large-Scale Behavior-Change Initiative for Infant and Young Child Feeding Advanced Language and Motor Development in a Cluster-Randomized Program Evaluation in Bangladesh.孟加拉国一项整群随机项目评估中,婴幼儿喂养大规模行为改变倡议促进了语言和运动发育。
J Nutr. 2017 Feb;147(2):256-263. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.240861. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development.养育关怀:促进儿童早期发展。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):91-102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course.幼儿发展步入成年期:贯穿生命历程的科学
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):77-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
8
Provision of Lipid-Based Nutrient Supplements from Age 6 to 18 Months Does Not Affect Infant Development Scores in a Randomized Trial in Malawi.在马拉维进行的一项随机试验中,6至18个月龄婴儿补充脂质营养补充剂不会影响其发育评分。
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Oct;20(10):2199-208. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2061-6.
9
Effects of pre- and post-natal lipid-based nutrient supplements on infant development in a randomized trial in Ghana.加纳一项随机试验中,产前和产后基于脂质的营养补充剂对婴儿发育的影响。
Early Hum Dev. 2016 Aug;99:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
10
Effects of an intervention on infant growth and development: evidence for different mechanisms at work.一项干预措施对婴儿生长发育的影响:不同作用机制的证据
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Apr;13(2). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12314. Epub 2016 May 4.