Frongillo Edward A, Nguyen Phuong H, Saha Kuntal K, Sanghvi Tina, Afsana Kaosar, Haque Raisul, Baker Jean, Ruel Marie T, Rawat Rahul, Menon Purnima
University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC;
Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
J Nutr. 2017 Feb;147(2):256-263. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.240861. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
Promoting adequate nutrition through interventions to improve infant and young child feeding (IYCF) has the potential to contribute to child development.
We examined whether an intensive intervention package that was aimed at improving IYCF at scale through the Alive & Thrive initiative in Bangladesh also advanced language and gross motor development, and whether advancements in language and gross motor development were explained through improved complementary feeding.
A cluster-randomized design compared 2 intervention packages: intensive interpersonal counseling on IYCF, mass media campaign, and community mobilization (intensive) compared with usual nutrition counseling and mass media campaign (nonintensive). Twenty subdistricts were randomly assigned to receive either the intensive or the nonintensive intervention. Household surveys were conducted at baseline (2010) and at endline (2014) in the same communities (n = ∼4000 children aged 0-47.9 mo for each round). Child development was measured by asking mothers if their child had reached each of multiple milestones, with some observed. Linear regression accounting for clustering was used to derive difference-in-differences (DID) impact estimates, and path analysis was used to examine developmental advancement through indicators of improved IYCF and other factors.
The DID in language development between intensive and nonintensive groups was 1.05 milestones (P = 0.001) among children aged 6-23.9 mo and 0.76 milestones (P = 0.038) among children aged 24-47.9 mo. For gross motor development, the DID was 0.85 milestones (P = 0.035) among children aged 6-23.9 mo. The differences observed corresponded to age- and sex-adjusted effect sizes of 0.35 for language and 0.23 for gross motor development. Developmental advancement at 6-23.9 mo was partially explained through improved minimum dietary diversity and the consumption of iron-rich food.
Intensive IYCF intervention differentially advanced language and gross motor development, which was partially explained through improved complementary feeding. Measuring a diverse set of child outcomes, including functional outcomes such as child development, is important when evaluating integrated nutrition programs. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01678716.
通过干预措施促进充足营养以改善婴幼儿喂养(IYCF),有可能对儿童发育产生促进作用。
我们研究了旨在通过孟加拉国“活力与茁壮成长”倡议大规模改善婴幼儿喂养的强化干预方案是否也能促进语言和大运动发育,以及语言和大运动发育的进展是否可通过改善辅食喂养来解释。
采用整群随机设计比较了2种干预方案:针对婴幼儿喂养的强化人际咨询、大众媒体宣传活动和社区动员(强化组)与常规营养咨询和大众媒体宣传活动(非强化组)。20个分区被随机分配接受强化或非强化干预。在同一社区于基线期(2010年)和终期(2014年)进行家庭调查(每轮约4000名0至47.9月龄儿童)。通过询问母亲其孩子是否达到多个发育里程碑中的每一个来测量儿童发育情况,部分进行了观察。采用考虑聚类的线性回归来得出差异中的差异(DID)影响估计值,并使用路径分析通过改善婴幼儿喂养的指标和其他因素来检查发育进展情况。
在6至23.9月龄儿童中,强化组与非强化组在语言发育方面的DID为1.05个里程碑(P = 0.001),在24至47.9月龄儿童中为0.76个里程碑(P = 0.038)。对于大运动发育,在6至23.9月龄儿童中,DID为0.85个里程碑(P = 0.035)。观察到的差异对应于语言发育的年龄和性别调整效应大小为0.35,大运动发育为0.23。6至23.9月龄时的发育进展部分可通过改善最低饮食多样性和富含铁食物的摄入来解释。
强化婴幼儿喂养干预对语言和大运动发育有不同程度的促进作用,这部分可通过改善辅食喂养来解释。在评估综合营养项目时,测量一系列不同的儿童结局,包括如儿童发育等功能结局,很重要。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov上注册为NCT01678716。