• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理清、解绑、向前推进:在不断变化的概念背景下构建卫生技术再评估。

UNTANGLING, UNBUNDLING, AND MOVING FORWARD: FRAMING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY REASSESSMENT IN THE CHANGING CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE.

机构信息

Department Community Health Sciences,O'Brien Institute for Public Health.

Department Community Health Sciences,O'Brien Institute for Public Health,Department of Critical Care Medicine.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(2):212-217. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000120. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462318000120
PMID:29616604
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Health technology reassessment (HTR) is a policy process to manage health technologies throughout their lifecycle and ensure their ongoing optimal use. However, within an ever-evolving field, HTR is only one of many concepts associated with the optimization of health technologies. There is limited understanding of how other concepts and processes might differ and/or be interrelated. This study aims to describe the concepts underlying the various technology optimization processes and to reconcile their relationships within the HTR process.

METHODS

A synthesis of the literature on approaches to HTR was completed. An inductive synthesis approach was completed to catalogue common concepts and themes. Expert stakeholders were consulted to develop a schematic to diagrammatically depict the relationships among concepts and frame them within the HTR process.

RESULTS

A practical schematic was developed. Common concepts and themes were organized under six major domains that address the following discussion questions: (i) what is the value of the existing technology?; (ii) what is the current utilization gap?; (iii) what are the available tools and resources?; (iv) what are the levers for change?; (v) what is the desired outcome?; and (vi) who are the foundational actors?

CONCLUSIONS

Using these six questions to frame the issues faced by HTR will advance the common understanding of HTR, as well as improve implementation of HTR initiatives. These questions will clearly identify the process required to move forward within a complex healthcare system.

摘要

目的

卫生技术评估(HTR)是一个贯穿卫生技术全生命周期的政策过程,旨在确保其持续优化使用。然而,在这一不断发展的领域中,HTR 只是与优化卫生技术相关的众多概念之一。对于其他概念和流程可能存在哪些差异和/或相互关系,人们的理解有限。本研究旨在描述各种技术优化流程背后的概念,并协调它们在 HTR 流程中的关系。

方法

对 HTR 方法的文献进行了综合分析。采用归纳综合方法对常见概念和主题进行分类。咨询了专家利益相关者,以制定一个示意图,以图示方式描绘概念之间的关系,并将其框定在 HTR 流程中。

结果

开发了一个实用的示意图。常见概念和主题被组织在六个主要领域下,这些领域涉及以下讨论问题:(i)现有技术的价值是什么?;(ii)当前利用差距是什么?;(iii)可用的工具和资源有哪些?;(iv)变革的杠杆是什么?;(v)期望的结果是什么?;以及(vi)基础行为者是谁?

结论

使用这六个问题来构建 HTR 面临的问题,将推进对 HTR 的共同理解,并改善 HTR 举措的实施。这些问题将明确确定在复杂的医疗保健系统中向前推进所需的流程。

相似文献

1
UNTANGLING, UNBUNDLING, AND MOVING FORWARD: FRAMING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY REASSESSMENT IN THE CHANGING CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE.理清、解绑、向前推进:在不断变化的概念背景下构建卫生技术再评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(2):212-217. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000120. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Knowledge translation and health technology reassessment: identifying synergy.知识转化与卫生技术重新评估:识别协同作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3494-y.
3
Moving low value care lists into action: prioritizing candidate health technologies for reassessment using administrative data.将低价值医疗清单付诸行动:利用行政数据对候选健康技术进行重新评估的优先级排序。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3459-1.
4
A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea.关于健康技术再评估现状的系统评价:对韩国的启示
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Nov 11;14(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0152-x.
5
Health technology reassessment: the art of the possible.卫生技术评估:实现可能之事的艺术。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):418-23. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000494.
6
Characteristics of knowledge translation theories, models and frameworks for health technology reassessment: expert perspectives through a qualitative exploration.卫生技术重新评估的知识转化理论、模型和框架的特征:通过定性探索得出的专家观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06382-8.
7
Health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: current practices.非药物技术的卫生技术重新评估:当前实践。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jul;28(3):220-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000438.
8
Deliberative process of health technology reassessment by health technology assessment agency in Korea.韩国卫生技术评估机构对卫生技术进行重新评估的审议过程。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 May 13;40(1):e28. doi: 10.1017/S026646232400014X.
9
Developing a How-to-Guide for Health Technology Reassessment: "The HTR Playbook".制定卫生技术再评估指南:《HTR 操作手册》。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2525-2532. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.180. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
10
Sustainability of healthcare systems in Asia: exploring the roles of horizon scanning and reassessment in the health technology assessment landscape.亚洲医疗体系的可持续性:探索在卫生技术评估领域中进行前瞻性扫描和重新评估的作用。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):262-269. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000252. Epub 2020 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence is not enough: health technology reassessment to de-implement low-value care.证据并不充分:进行卫生技术重新评估以减少低价值医疗服务的使用。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 3;22(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01249-w.
2
The added value of applying a disinvestment approach to the process of health technology assessment in Italy.应用去投资方法于意大利卫生技术评估过程的附加值。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Mar 2;39(1):e17. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000107.
3
Developing a How-to-Guide for Health Technology Reassessment: "The HTR Playbook".
制定卫生技术再评估指南:《HTR 操作手册》。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2525-2532. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.180. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
4
Characteristics of knowledge translation theories, models and frameworks for health technology reassessment: expert perspectives through a qualitative exploration.卫生技术重新评估的知识转化理论、模型和框架的特征:通过定性探索得出的专家观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06382-8.
5
Moving low value care lists into action: prioritizing candidate health technologies for reassessment using administrative data.将低价值医疗清单付诸行动:利用行政数据对候选健康技术进行重新评估的优先级排序。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3459-1.