Department of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Healthy Workspaces, P.O. Box 40, 00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;15(4):679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040679.
The aim of this study was to develop and test a tool for assessing urgency of indoor air quality (IAQ) measures. The condition of the 27 buildings were investigated and results were categorized. Statistical test studied the differences between the categories and the employees’ complaints about their work environment. To study the employees’ experiences of the work premises, a validated indoor air (IA) questionnaire was used. This study reveals a multifaceted problem: many factors affecting IAQ may also affect perceived IAQ, making it difficult to separate the impurity sources and ventilation system deficiencies affecting to employee experiences. An examination of the relationship between the categories and perceived IAQ revealed an association between the mould odour perceived by employees and mould detected by the researcher. A weak link was also found between the assessed categories and environmental complaints. However, we cannot make far-reaching conclusions regarding the assessed probability of abnormal IA exposure in the building on the basis of employee experiences. According to the results, categorising tool can partly support the assessment of the urgency for repairs when several factors that affect IAQ are taken into account.
本研究旨在开发和测试一种用于评估室内空气质量(IAQ)措施紧迫性的工具。研究了 27 座建筑物的状况,并对结果进行了分类。统计测试研究了类别之间以及员工对工作环境投诉的差异。为了研究员工对工作场所的体验,使用了经过验证的室内空气(IA)问卷。这项研究揭示了一个多方面的问题:许多影响室内空气质量的因素也可能影响感知的室内空气质量,因此很难将影响员工体验的杂质源和通风系统缺陷分开。对类别和感知室内空气质量之间的关系进行检查,发现员工感知到的霉菌气味与研究人员检测到的霉菌之间存在关联。在评估的类别和环境投诉之间也发现了一个薄弱环节。然而,根据员工的经验,我们不能就建筑物中异常室内空气暴露的评估概率得出深远的结论。根据研究结果,分类工具可以在考虑影响室内空气质量的几个因素的情况下,部分支持对维修紧迫性的评估。