Mantha Madhavi, Urban John R, Mark William A, Chernyshev Anatoly, Kubachka Kevin M
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Forensic Chemistry Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Isotope Laboratory, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
J AOAC Int. 2018 Nov 1;101(6):1857-1863. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.17-0491. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
In the last several years, economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of foods including honey has received increased attention. The addition of inexpensive sweeteners such as high fructose corn syrup or cane sugar to honey is still encountered despite scientific methods that can routinely detect this type of adulteration. The standard method for detection of these adulterants utilizes isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS); however, this technique requires an elevated degree of technical knowledge for operation as well as a high cost for purchase and maintenance. Cavity ring down spectroscopy (CRDS) has demonstrated potential for this type of analysis and is less expensive with simpler operation. This study evaluates CRDS for the detection of low-cost sweeteners added to honey and compares the performance of CRDS to IRMS. Several honey samples were analyzed, and the advantages and limitations specific to CRDS were evaluated. Overall, the results indicate that CRDS provides a performance comparable to the benchmark technique IRMS for EMA honey analysis.
在过去几年中,包括蜂蜜在内的食品受经济利益驱动的掺假行为(EMA)受到了越来越多的关注。尽管有能够常规检测此类掺假行为的科学方法,但往蜂蜜中添加廉价甜味剂(如高果糖玉米糖浆或蔗糖)的情况仍时有发生。检测这些掺假物的标准方法是利用同位素比率质谱法(IRMS);然而,这项技术操作需要较高的专业知识水平,购买和维护成本也很高。光腔衰荡光谱法(CRDS)已显示出进行此类分析的潜力,且成本更低、操作更简单。本研究评估了CRDS用于检测添加到蜂蜜中的低成本甜味剂的情况,并将CRDS的性能与IRMS进行了比较。分析了多个蜂蜜样本,并评估了CRDS特有的优缺点。总体而言,结果表明,在EMA蜂蜜分析方面,CRDS的性能与基准技术IRMS相当。