• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自心理健康法庭的法庭指令评估。

Court-Ordered Evaluations From a Mental Health Court.

作者信息

Judd Seth, Parker George F

机构信息

Dr. Judd is a Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry, University of South Carolina School of Medicine. Dr. Parker is a Professor of Clinical Psychiatry and Director of Forensic Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Mar;46(1):52-62.

PMID:29618536
Abstract

Mental health courts (MHCs) have been in existence for more than 20 years, but little is known about the demographics, clinical features, and court outcomes of MHC defendants court-ordered for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations. We examined these items in defendants who underwent CST evaluations for the Marion County, IN, MHC. The MHC defendants were significantly more likely than defendants referred from other courts to be male, black, unemployed, and on disability, and have a history of prior arrests and psychiatric treatment. MHC defendants found incompetent to stand trial (ICST) were significantly more likely to have a psychotic disorder and a high school education than MHC defendants found CST, and they were significantly less likely to have a mood disorder, to be on psychiatric medication, or to cooperate in forensic interviews. Evaluator concordance of primary diagnoses was linked to concordance of CST opinion. There were no significant differences in the outcome of charges between CST and ICST MHC defendants. This study highlights several important findings. First, evaluator concordance of diagnoses is linked to evaluator concordance of opinion. Second, the Marion County MHC functioned in a non-adversarial manner by not discriminating against defendants who were found ICST at the time of final judgment.

摘要

心理健康法庭(MHCs)已经存在了20多年,但对于因受法庭命令接受接受审判能力(CST)评估的MHC被告的人口统计学特征、临床特征和法庭判决结果却知之甚少。我们对印第安纳州马里恩县MHC接受CST评估的被告的这些情况进行了调查。与从其他法庭转来的被告相比,MHC被告更有可能是男性、黑人、失业者和领取残疾津贴者,并且有先前被捕和接受精神治疗的历史。被认定无接受审判能力(ICST)的MHC被告比被认定有接受审判能力(CST)的MHC被告更有可能患有精神障碍且只有高中学历,而他们患情绪障碍、正在接受精神科药物治疗或在法医面谈中合作的可能性则显著更低。主要诊断的评估者一致性与CST意见的一致性相关。CST和ICST的MHC被告在指控结果上没有显著差异。本研究突出了几个重要发现。第一,诊断的评估者一致性与意见的评估者一致性相关。第二,马里恩县MHC以非对抗性方式运作,在终审时不歧视被认定为ICST的被告。

相似文献

1
Court-Ordered Evaluations From a Mental Health Court.来自心理健康法庭的法庭指令评估。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Mar;46(1):52-62.
2
Long-term recidivism of mental health court defendants.心理健康法庭被告的长期累犯情况。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;37(5):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.017. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
3
Combined evaluations of competency to stand trial and mental state at the time of the offense: An overlooked methodological consideration?联合评估受审能力和犯罪时的精神状态:被忽视的方法学考虑因素?
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Jun;41(3):217-229. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000236. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
4
Factors that predict murder defendants' competence to stand trial.预测谋杀案被告受审能力的因素。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Aug;59:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
5
Competency to stand trial evaluations: A state-wide review of court-ordered reports.审判能力评估:全州范围内法院指令报告的审查。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 Jan;38(1):32-50. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2436. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Characteristics and outcomes for defendants charged with misdemeanors referred for court-ordered competency evaluations.被指控轻罪并被转介进行法院命令的能力评估的被告的特征和结果。
Psychol Serv. 2022 May;19(2):252-260. doi: 10.1037/ser0000535. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Guidelines for determining restorability of competency to stand trial and recommendations for involuntary treatment.判定接受审判能力可恢复性的指南及非自愿治疗建议。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jul;66(4):1201-1209. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14746. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
The role of competency to stand trial in mental health courts.接受审判的能力在心理健康法庭中的作用。
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):245-58. doi: 10.1002/bsl.649.
9
The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia sanity evaluations.轻罪逮捕对法医心理健康服务的影响:弗吉尼亚州精神评估的全州审查。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;44(4):286-299. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000417.
10
Psycholegal abilities and restoration of competence to stand trial.心理法律能力与恢复审判能力。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):710-28. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2040. Epub 2012 Sep 19.