1 Center for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
2 Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina.
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Nov;24(11):922-926. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0129. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
Medical staff credentialing is the time-intensive process of verifying a provider's qualifications before granting privileges within a hospital. This process creates a large administrative barrier for telehealth services, as a large number of providers must be credentialed at each participating originating site within a telehealth network.
Despite the availability of a streamlined telehealth credentialing method called Credentialing by Proxy (CBP), a significant number of hospitals still opt for traditional credentialing. This project seeks to better understand the barriers and benefits to CBP.
This study utilized stratified sampling to recruit nine participants who manage telehealth credentialing. Researchers conducted qualitative interviews using a semistructured interview guide and analysis through the constant comparative method. Length of the credentialing time for providers was also tracked over an 18-month period for 20 originating sites.
The majority of participants experienced uncertainty due to a loss of control over the process with CBP but also acknowledged the benefits of this method. Hospitals utilizing CBP had a significantly shortened credentialing period of 36 days, compared with 103 days with traditional credentialing.
A lack of clarity and a fear of ultimate responsibility or liability were the largest contributors to uncertainty. Factors that decreased uncertainty among originating site hospitals included awareness of regulatory standards for CBP, continuing to check certain credentialing requirements themselves, and adopting a "wait-and-see approach."
This study provided valuable insights into the barriers and benefits of CBP and can be utilized to better address these barriers and increase efficiency within telehealth networks.
医务人员认证是在医院内授予特权之前验证提供者资格的耗时过程。这个过程为远程医疗服务创建了一个巨大的行政障碍,因为在远程医疗网络中的每个参与的发起站点,都必须对大量的提供者进行认证。
尽管有一种名为代理认证(Credentialing by Proxy,CBP)的简化远程医疗认证方法,但仍有许多医院选择传统认证。本项目旨在更好地了解 CBP 的障碍和优势。
本研究使用分层抽样招募了 9 名管理远程医疗认证的参与者。研究人员使用半结构化访谈指南进行定性访谈,并通过不断比较法进行分析。还在 18 个月的时间内,对 20 个发起站点的提供者认证时间进行了跟踪。
大多数参与者由于对 CBP 过程失去控制而感到不确定,但也承认了这种方法的好处。使用 CBP 的医院的认证周期明显缩短,为 36 天,而传统认证则为 103 天。
缺乏明确性和对最终责任或责任的恐惧是不确定性的最大因素。降低发起站点医院不确定性的因素包括对 CBP 的监管标准的认识、继续自行检查某些认证要求,以及采取“观望态度”。
本研究深入了解了 CBP 的障碍和优势,并可用于更好地解决这些障碍,提高远程医疗网络的效率。