Suppr超能文献

丧钟为谁而鸣:阿隆索与区域衰落科学

For Whom the Bells Toll: Alonso and a Regional Science of Decline.

作者信息

Franklin Rachel S, van Leeuwen Eveline S

机构信息

Spatial Structures in the Social Sciences (S4)/Population Studies and Training Center (PSTC), Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Department of Spatial Economics, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Reg Sci Rev. 2018 Mar;41(2):134-151. doi: 10.1177/0160017616675917. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

Abstract

In his presidential address to the Regional Science Association over thirty years ago, William Alonso presented the case for "Five Bell Shapes in Development" and argued that "the developed countries will enter fully in to the realm of the right-hand tail of these curves" (p. 16) and that this transition might result in several surprises. He proposed, therefore, that we should study the right tail of these "curves" as well as interactions among them. Much of what Alonso suggested has come to pass, although his prognostications were not always exact. And although he touched on several issues of relevance to regional scientists, the discipline has been slow to move away from a growth-centered paradigm. The strength of regional science-the capacity to consider economic, demographic, and geographical aspects of an issue simultaneously-has yet to be focused on some of the "right-hand" challenges that have arisen, population loss, for example. In this article, we provide a review of regional science research within the context of Alonso's five bells and hypothesize how Alonso's propositions might differ in today's world. We then focus more specifically on one particular area: population loss. Using these examples allows us to highlight how regional science might contribute to the conceptualization of "right-hand tail" development challenges, especially where theory, issues of spatial scale, and interregional dependencies are concerned.

摘要

三十多年前,威廉·阿隆索在其对区域科学协会的主席致辞中提出了“发展中的五种钟形曲线”的观点,并认为“发达国家将全面进入这些曲线右尾的范畴”(第16页),且这种转变可能会带来一些意外情况。因此,他提议我们应该研究这些“曲线”的右尾以及它们之间的相互作用。阿隆索所提出的许多观点已经成为现实,尽管他的预测并不总是准确的。而且,尽管他触及了一些与区域科学家相关的问题,但该学科在摆脱以增长为中心的范式方面进展缓慢。区域科学的优势——能够同时考虑一个问题的经济、人口和地理方面——尚未聚焦于一些已经出现的“右尾”挑战,例如人口流失。在本文中,我们在阿隆索的五种钟形曲线的背景下对区域科学研究进行了综述,并推测阿隆索的观点在当今世界可能会有哪些不同。然后,我们更具体地关注一个特定领域:人口流失。通过这些例子,我们能够突出区域科学如何有助于对“右尾”发展挑战进行概念化,特别是在涉及理论、空间尺度问题和区域间依存关系的方面。

相似文献

1
For Whom the Bells Toll: Alonso and a Regional Science of Decline.丧钟为谁而鸣:阿隆索与区域衰落科学
Int Reg Sci Rev. 2018 Mar;41(2):134-151. doi: 10.1177/0160017616675917. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
Physical Biology : challenges for our second decade.物理生物学:我们第二个十年的挑战。
Phys Biol. 2014 Jun;11(3):030201. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/11/3/030201. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
I come to bury (population) growth, not to praise it.我来是为了埋葬(人口)增长,而非赞颂它。
Spat Econ Anal. 2020;15(4):359-373. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2020.1802056. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验