Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)中的缺血修饰白蛋白(IMA)。它有区别吗?

Ischemia modified albumin (IMA) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Does it make the difference?

作者信息

Wahab Mohamed Abdel Kader Abdel

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, El Minya University, Egypt.

出版信息

Egypt Heart J. 2017 Sep;69(3):183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of patients with a suspected ACS and LBBB is a challenge to the clinician.

AIM

To detect the ability of IMA to exclude myocardial ischemia in suspected patients with ACS and LBBB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 68 patients with suspected ACS and LBBB (group I) and another twenty patients age and sex matched known to have LBBB with normal coronary angiography (group II) were included in this study and subjected to: routine laboratory tests, 12 lead ECG, echocardiography, and measurement of serum troponin I (TnI) and IMA (measured by ELISA). Diagnostic coronary angiography was performed on all patients and scored by severity and modified Gensini scores.

RESULTS

IMA and TnI levels are significantly increased in group I compared to group II (P value <0.001. IMA with a cutoff value >95 could predict significant CAD (lesions >50%) with AUC of 0.923, sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 83.33%, PPV of 93.6%, NPV of 71.4% and accuracy 86.76%. Moreover, by using both simple and multiple logistic regression analyses IMA could also independently detect significant CAD. The combined use of IMA and TnI significantly improved the sensitivity and the negative predictive value to 98% and 90.9% respectively.

CONCLUSION

There was a distinct advantage of measuring IMA in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain and LBBB to rule out a final diagnosis of ACS.

摘要

背景

对疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)且伴有左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的患者进行管理,对临床医生来说是一项挑战。

目的

检测缺血修饰白蛋白(IMA)在疑似ACS且伴有LBBB患者中排除心肌缺血的能力。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了68例疑似ACS且伴有LBBB的患者(I组)以及另外20例年龄和性别匹配、已知患有LBBB且冠状动脉造影正常的患者(II组),并对其进行了:常规实验室检查、12导联心电图、超声心动图以及血清肌钙蛋白I(TnI)和IMA(采用酶联免疫吸附测定法检测)的测定。对所有患者进行诊断性冠状动脉造影,并根据严重程度和改良的Gensini评分进行评分。

结果

与II组相比,I组的IMA和TnI水平显著升高(P值<0.001)。IMA临界值>95时可预测显著冠状动脉疾病(病变>50%),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.923,敏感性为88%,特异性为83.33%,阳性预测值为93.6%,阴性预测值为71.4%,准确率为86.76%。此外,通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析,IMA也能够独立检测出显著冠状动脉疾病。联合使用IMA和TnI可将敏感性和阴性预测值分别显著提高至98%和90.9%。

结论

对于因急性胸痛和LBBB就诊于急诊科的患者,检测IMA对于排除ACS的最终诊断具有明显优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6359/5883488/8570db32cdd4/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验