• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的研究:腋窝超声成像在术前分期淋巴结阳性乳腺浸润性小叶癌中的敏感性。

Population-based study of the sensitivity of axillary ultrasound imaging in the preoperative staging of node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

机构信息

Department of Academic Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Surgery, Wishaw General Hospital, Wishaw, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):987-995. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10791. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.10791
PMID:29623677
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative staging of the axilla is important to allow decisions regarding neoadjuvant treatment and the management of the axilla. Invasive lobular carcinoma metastases are difficult to detect because of the infiltrative pattern of the nodal spread. In this study the sensitivity of preoperative axillary staging between invasive lobular (ILC) and ductal (IDC) carcinoma was compared.

METHODS

All women diagnosed with pure ILC or IDC in the West of Scotland in 2012-2014 were identified from a database maintained prospectively within the Managed Clinical Network. Pretreatment axillary ultrasound imaging (AUS), core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results were compared between ILC and IDC.

RESULTS

Some 602 women with ILC and 4199 with IDC had undergone axillary surgery, of whom 209 and 1402 respectively had nodal metastases. Pretreatment AUS sensitivity was significantly lower in ILC than in IDC (32·1 versus 50·1 per cent respectively, P < 0·001; OR 0·47, 95 per cent c.i. 0·34 to 0·64). Core biopsy had equally high sensitivity of 86 per cent in both subtypes; however, FNAC was significantly less sensitive in both ILC (55 per cent; P = 0·003) and IDC (75·6 per cent; P = 0·006). Multivariable analysis revealed that cT3-4 status and symptomatic presentation were both significant in predicting nodal metastasis in patients with ILC and false-negative AUS findings (OR 3·77, 95 per cent c.i. 1·69 to 8·42, P = 0·001; and OR 1·92, 1·24 to 2·98, P = 0·003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

AUS is inferior in detecting axillary node metastasis in ILC compared with IDC. Women with cT3-4 lobular carcinoma may benefit from ultrasound-guided axillary biopsy regardless of the ultrasonographic appearance of the nodes.

摘要

背景

腋窝的术前分期对于决定新辅助治疗和腋窝处理至关重要。由于淋巴结扩散的浸润模式,浸润性小叶癌转移难以检测。本研究比较了浸润性小叶癌(ILC)和导管癌(IDC)腋窝术前分期的敏感性。

方法

从 2012-2014 年在苏格兰西部建立的管理临床网络中前瞻性维护的数据库中确定所有被诊断为单纯 ILC 或 IDC 的女性。比较 ILC 和 IDC 之间的术前腋窝超声成像(AUS)、核心活检和细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)结果。

结果

602 例 ILC 和 4199 例 IDC 患者接受了腋窝手术,其中分别有 209 例和 1402 例有淋巴结转移。术前 AUS 在 ILC 中的敏感性明显低于 IDC(分别为 32.1%和 50.1%,P<0.001;OR 0.47,95%置信区间 0.34 至 0.64)。两种亚型的核心活检敏感性均高达 86%;然而,FNAC 在 ILC(55%;P=0.003)和 IDC(75.6%;P=0.006)中的敏感性均明显较低。多变量分析显示,cT3-4 状态和症状表现均是预测 ILC 患者淋巴结转移和假阴性 AUS 结果的重要因素(OR 3.77,95%置信区间 1.69 至 8.42,P=0.001;OR 1.92,1.24 至 2.98,P=0.003)。

结论

与 IDC 相比,AUS 在检测 ILC 腋窝淋巴结转移方面效果较差。cT3-4 小叶癌患者可能受益于超声引导下腋窝活检,无论淋巴结的超声表现如何。

相似文献

1
Population-based study of the sensitivity of axillary ultrasound imaging in the preoperative staging of node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.基于人群的研究:腋窝超声成像在术前分期淋巴结阳性乳腺浸润性小叶癌中的敏感性。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):987-995. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10791. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
2
The sensitivity of pre-operative axillary staging in breast cancer: comparison of invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma.乳腺癌术前腋窝分期的敏感性:浸润性小叶癌和导管癌的比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;40(7):813-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
3
Axillary node staging by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients with breast cancer.乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结的超声检查和细针穿刺细胞学检查。
Br J Surg. 2010 May;97(5):680-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6964.
4
Axillary ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients.腋窝超声及细针穿刺细胞学检查在乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移术前分期中的应用
Breast. 2016 Dec;30:146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
Is Pre-Operative Axillary Staging with Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Reliable in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast?术前使用超声及超声引导下细针穿刺进行腋窝分期在乳腺浸润性小叶癌中是否可靠?
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Jun;42(6):1263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
6
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Isolated Tumor Cells in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.浸润性小叶癌与导管癌中前哨淋巴结活检及孤立肿瘤细胞的研究
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Aug;16(4):e75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Rapid on-site evaluation of axillary fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer.乳腺癌腋部细针抽吸细胞学的快速现场评估。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jun;99(6):807-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8738. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
8
Axillary tumour burden in women with a fine-needle aspiration/core biopsy-proven positive node on ultrasonography compared to women with a positive sentinel node.超声检查证实存在细针抽吸/核心活检阳性淋巴结的女性与前哨淋巴结阳性的女性相比腋窝肿瘤负担。
Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1811-1815. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10661. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
9
Influence of tumor histology on preoperative staging accuracy of breast metastases to the axilla.肿瘤组织学对腋窝转移性乳腺癌术前分期准确性的影响。
Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):49-55. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12042. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
Is axillary sonographic staging less accurate in invasive lobular breast cancer than in ductal breast cancer?浸润性小叶癌的腋窝超声分期是否比导管癌的腋窝超声分期准确性更低?
J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Oct;33(10):1805-10. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.10.1805.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic dilemma of lobular carcinoma: a mini-review of imaging modalities and the role of artificial intelligence and radiomics.小叶癌的诊断困境:影像学检查方法以及人工智能和放射组学作用的小型综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 27;15:1515037. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1515037. eCollection 2025.
2
Multiparametric ultrasound assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer.乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结的多参数超声评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):23072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73376-x.
3
Prediction of High Nodal Burden in Patients With Sentinel Node-Positive Luminal ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer.
前哨淋巴结阳性、腔面型ERBB2阴性乳腺癌患者高淋巴结负荷的预测
JAMA Surg. 2024 Dec 1;159(12):1393-1403. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3944.
4
SOUND (Sentinel Node Versus Observation After Axillary Ultrasound) Trial: Are We Ready to Change the Tune of Our Breast Cancer Practice?哨兵淋巴结超声引导下活检与观察对比(SOUND)试验:我们是否准备好改变乳腺癌治疗的策略?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3672-3674. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15111-4. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
High-accuracy prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive lobular carcinoma using focal cortical thickening on magnetic resonance imaging.利用磁共振成像的皮质局部增厚预测浸润性小叶癌腋窝淋巴结转移的高准确性。
Breast Cancer. 2023 Jul;30(4):637-646. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01457-2. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
Accuracy and Utility of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Lymph Node Biopsy for Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.术前超声引导下腋窝淋巴结活检在浸润性乳腺癌中的准确性和实用性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 27;2022:3307627. doi: 10.1155/2022/3307627. eCollection 2022.
7
Development and validation of a pre- and intra-operative scoring system that distinguishes between non-advanced and advanced axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective study.开发和验证一种术前和术中评分系统,以区分前哨淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌中非进展性和进展性腋窝淋巴结转移:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep 28;20(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02779-9.
8
Perivascular infiltration reflects subclinical lymph node metastasis in invasive lobular carcinoma.血管周围浸润反映浸润性小叶癌的亚临床淋巴结转移。
Virchows Arch. 2022 Oct;481(4):533-543. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03391-8. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
9
St Gallen 2019 guidelines understage the axilla in lobular breast cancer: a population-based study.圣加仑 2019 指南忽视了乳腺癌中的腋窝:一项基于人群的研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 1;108(12):1465-1473. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab327.
10
Predicting pathological axillary lymph node status with ultrasound following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.新辅助治疗乳腺癌后超声预测腋窝病理性淋巴结状态。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;189(1):131-144. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06283-8. Epub 2021 Jun 12.