• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Clinical drug profiles: an instrument to improve shared decision-making].

作者信息

Jongen P J

机构信息

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, afd. Sociale Geneeskunde, Groningen en MS4 Research Institute, Nijmegen.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018;162:D2162.

PMID:29623864
Abstract

Doctors and patients are increasingly choosing treatment options by means of the shared decision-making process. However, human decisions are subject to cognitive bias, i.e. systematic and predictable errors in probability estimation and information synthesis. Decision-making may also be hampered by incomplete information. Clinical Drug Profiles (CDPs) aim to provide up-to-date, evidence-based and independent information about drug characteristics that are relevant to doctors and patients alike in the context of shared decision-making. They contain information about mechanisms of action, mode and frequency of administration, clinical efficacy, therapeutic effectiveness, side effects, persistence and adherence, and safety monitoring. CDPs are to be made freely available on the internet, thus enabling doctors and patients to obtain drug-specific information on potential benefits and risks, before or during the decision-making process. In addition, the patient can make a subjective appraisal of the chances of success and the risk of side effects. In all, CDPs increase the likelihood that two major conditions of successful shared decision-making are met: minimisation of cognitive bias and complete information.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Clinical drug profiles: an instrument to improve shared decision-making].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018;162:D2162.
2
Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial.将常规结果监测作为信息来源用于精神卫生保健中的共同决策:一项整群随机对照试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Dec 15;15:313. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2.
3
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
4
Shared Decision Making Interventions: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence with Implications for Health Literacy.共同决策干预措施:理论与实证证据及其对健康素养的启示
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:263-283.
5
Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice.基层医疗中的共同决策:调整查尔斯等人的模型以适应全科医疗的背景。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Aug;62(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 31.
6
Health literacy and patient safety.健康素养与患者安全。
Minn Med. 2004 Apr;87(4):32-4.
7
[Oncology is not waiting for "shared decision-making" Patients and doctors generally reach consensus].肿瘤学不会等待“共同决策” 患者和医生通常会达成共识
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D1393.
8
Patients' Values in Clinical Decision-Making.患者在临床决策中的价值观。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2017 Sep;17(3):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
The Role of Universal Health Literacy Precautions in Minimizing "Medspeak" and Promoting Shared Decision Making.通用健康素养预防措施在减少“医学术语”及促进共同决策中的作用
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):296-303. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.3.pfor1-1703.
10
Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.衡量会诊中的共同决策:OPTION 工具与知情决策工具的比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 17.