Suppr超能文献

基于 Truven MarketScan 数据库的托莫西汀治疗儿童和青少年抽动障碍的评估:一项回顾性队列研究。

Evaluation of dystonia in children and adolescents treated with atomoxetine within the Truven MarketScan database: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

a Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis , IN , USA.

b Eli Lilly and Company , Sesto F.no (FI) , Italy.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 May;17(5):467-473. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1462333. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Atomoxetine is a non-stimulant drug indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children aged ≥6 years, adolescents, and adults. In this retrospective cohort study, the incidence and risk of dystonia in children and adolescents treated with atomoxetine was compared to a propensity score-matched cohort of stimulant users.

METHODS

Data between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2014 from patients aged 6-17 years in the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan database were used to generate two cohorts of patients: (1) atomoxetine users and (2) stimulant (methylphenidates or amphetamines) users. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare incidence of dystonia across propensity score-matched cohorts.

RESULTS

Of the 70,657 atomoxetine users, 70,655 users were propensity score-matched to a stimulant user. In the atomoxetine- and stimulant-treated cohorts, the crude incidence rates of dystonia were 54.9 (95% CI: 27.1-82.7) and 77.9 (95% CI: 49.1-106.8) per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The hazard ratio for occurrence of dystonia with atomoxetine use relative to stimulant use was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.36 - 1.28; P = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

In this large retrospective cohort study, there was no significant difference in incidence or risk of dystonia among patients treated with atomoxetine compared to stimulants.

摘要

目的

阿托西汀是一种非兴奋剂药物,适用于治疗 6 岁及以上儿童、青少年和成人的注意力缺陷/多动障碍。在这项回顾性队列研究中,与兴奋剂使用者的倾向评分匹配队列相比,接受阿托西汀治疗的儿童和青少年的肌张力障碍发生率和风险。

方法

使用 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan 数据库中年龄在 6-17 岁的患者数据,生成了两个患者队列:(1)阿托西汀使用者和(2)兴奋剂(哌醋甲酯或安非他命)使用者。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型比较了倾向评分匹配队列中肌张力障碍的发生率。

结果

在 70657 名阿托西汀使用者中,有 70655 名使用者与兴奋剂使用者进行了倾向评分匹配。在阿托西汀和兴奋剂治疗组中,肌张力障碍的粗发生率分别为 54.9(95%CI:27.1-82.7)和 77.9(95%CI:49.1-106.8)/100000 人年。与使用兴奋剂相比,使用阿托西汀发生肌张力障碍的风险比为 0.68(95%CI:0.36-1.28;P=0.23)。

结论

在这项大型回顾性队列研究中,与兴奋剂相比,接受阿托西汀治疗的患者在肌张力障碍的发生率或风险方面没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验