a Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Marlborough , MA , USA.
b Optum, Health Analytics and Outcomes Research , Eden Prairie , MN , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):211-219. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1462787. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
This observational study compared the risk of hospitalization for patients with bipolar disorder when treated with lurasidone versus other oral atypical antipsychotics.
This US commercial claims analysis (4 April 2010 through 24 September 2014) used the Optum Research Database to identify adult patients with bipolar disorder treated with oral atypical antipsychotics (N = 11,132). The first claim for an atypical antipsychotic defined the index date, with pre-index and post-index periods of 180 and 360 days, respectively. Every month of the post-index period was categorized as monotherapy treatment with lurasidone, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, no/minimal treatment or other. Starting with the initial month of treatment, the risk of psychiatric or all-cause hospitalization in the subsequent month was examined based on treatment in the current month and pre-index covariates (age, gender, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, diagnoses for anxiety, alcohol abuse, substance abuse, hypertension, type 2 diabetes and obesity) and time-varying versions of the pre-index covariates using a marginal structural model.
After controlling for covariates, relative to lurasidone, the odds of psychiatric and all-cause hospitalization, respectively, were 2-3 times higher for olanzapine (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, CI 1.09, 7.08, p = .032; OR = 3.20, CI 1.24, 8.26, p = .016), quetiapine (OR = 2.80, CI 1.13, 6.95, p = .026; OR = 3.23, CI 1.29, 8.11, p = .013), risperidone (OR = 2.50, CI 1.01, 6.21, p = .048; OR = 2.79, CI 1.11, 7.02, p = .029), aripiprazole (OR = 2.13, CI 0.87, 5.20, p = .097; OR = 2.57, CI 1.04, 6.37, p = .041) and ziprasidone (OR =2.31, CI 0.91, 5.85, p = .079; OR = 2.49, CI 0.97, 6.40, p = .058).
In this claims database analysis, lurasidone-treated patients with bipolar disorder had a significantly lower risk of psychiatric hospitalization compared to quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone, but not aripiprazole or ziprasidone. Lurasidone-treated patients had a significantly lower risk of all-cause hospitalization compared to quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone and aripiprazole, but not ziprasidone.
本观察性研究比较了双相情感障碍患者使用鲁拉西酮与其他口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗时的住院风险。
本项美国商业索赔分析(2010 年 4 月 4 日至 2014 年 9 月 24 日)使用 Optum Research Database 确定了接受口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的成年双相情感障碍患者(n=11132)。首次使用非典型抗精神病药物的索赔定义了索引日期,分别有 180 天和 360 天的预索引期和索引期。索引后期间的每个月都分为鲁拉西酮、阿立哌唑、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮、齐拉西酮、最低治疗或其他单药治疗。从初始治疗月开始,根据当前月的治疗情况以及预索引协变量(年龄、性别、住院、急诊就诊、焦虑、酒精滥用、药物滥用、高血压、2 型糖尿病和肥胖症诊断)以及使用边缘结构模型的预索引协变量的时变版本,检查随后一个月的精神科或全因住院风险。
在控制协变量后,与鲁拉西酮相比,奥氮平(比值比[OR] = 2.78,95%CI 1.09,7.08,p = 0.032;OR = 3.20,95%CI 1.24,8.26,p = 0.016)、喹硫平(OR = 2.80,95%CI 1.13,6.95,p = 0.026;OR = 3.23,95%CI 1.29,8.11,p = 0.013)、利培酮(OR = 2.50,95%CI 1.01,6.21,p = 0.048;OR = 2.79,95%CI 1.11,7.02,p = 0.029)、阿立哌唑(OR = 2.13,95%CI 0.87,5.20,p = 0.097;OR = 2.57,95%CI 1.04,6.37,p = 0.041)和齐拉西酮(OR = 2.31,95%CI 0.91,5.85,p = 0.079;OR = 2.49,95%CI 0.97,6.40,p = 0.058)的精神病住院风险高 2-3 倍。
在这项索赔数据库分析中,与喹硫平、奥氮平和利培酮相比,接受鲁拉西酮治疗的双相情感障碍患者的精神病住院风险显著降低,但与阿立哌唑或齐拉西酮无显著差异。与喹硫平、奥氮平、利培酮和阿立哌唑相比,接受鲁拉西酮治疗的患者的全因住院风险显著降低,但与齐拉西酮无显著差异。