Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
J Card Fail. 2018 May;24(5):337-341. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
The utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in the management of myocarditis in the era of advanced cardiac imaging has been challenged.
The Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database (years 1998-2013) was queried to identify hospitalization records with a primary diagnosis of myocarditis, and underwent EMB procedure. We identified 22,299 hospitalization records with a diagnosis of myocarditis during the study period. Of those, 798 (3.6%) underwent EMB procedures. There was an average decrease in the incidence of EMB for myocarditis by 0.15% (P < .01) over the study period. Younger patients, women, and those with chronic kidney disease were more likely to undergo EMB. On multivariate analysis, patients with myocarditis who underwent EMB had higher in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-2.74) and longer median hospital stay (9 days vs 3 days; P < .001). EMB was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac tamponade (odds ratio [OR] 5.21, 95% CI 2.76-9.82), cardiogenic shock (OR 4.66, 95% CI 3.75-5.78), need for intra-aortic balloon pump (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.49-4.97), and need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 4.26, 95% CI 2.78-6.53).
The use of EMB in hospitalizations with myocarditis has decreased over time. The use of EMB was associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Whether these findings represent a causative association from the procedure or a consequence of more severe disease in this group could not be confirmed in this study.
在先进的心脏成像时代,心内膜心肌活检(EMB)在心肌炎管理中的作用受到了挑战。
本研究利用 1998 年至 2013 年全国住院患者样本数据库(NIS),检索出主要诊断为心肌炎并接受 EMB 检查的住院记录。在研究期间,共确定了 22299 例心肌炎住院记录,其中 798 例(3.6%)接受了 EMB 检查。在此期间,EMB 检查用于心肌炎的比例平均每年下降 0.15%(P<0.01)。年轻患者、女性患者和慢性肾脏病患者更有可能接受 EMB 检查。多变量分析显示,接受 EMB 检查的心肌炎患者院内死亡率更高(风险比[HR] 1.97,95%置信区间[CI] 1.41-2.74),中位住院时间更长(9 天 vs 3 天;P<0.001)。EMB 与心脏压塞(优势比[OR] 5.21,95% CI 2.76-9.82)、心源性休克(OR 4.66,95% CI 3.75-5.78)、主动脉内球囊泵(OR 3.52,95% CI 2.49-4.97)和体外膜氧合(OR 4.26,95% CI 2.78-6.53)的发生率增加相关。
随着时间的推移,EMB 在心肌炎住院患者中的应用逐渐减少。EMB 的使用与更高的院内死亡率和发病率相关。在这项研究中,无法确定这些发现是由于该程序引起的因果关系,还是由于该组患者疾病更为严重所致。