• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查中国环渤海地区和黄土高原苹果园中加拿大蓬(Conyza canadensis (L.))的草甘膦抗性水平和靶标位点抗性(TSR)机制。

Investigation of glyphosate resistance levels and target-site based resistance (TSR) mechanisms in Conyza canadensis (L.) from apple orchards around areas of Bohai seas and Loess Plateau in China.

机构信息

Department of Applied Chemistry, China Agricultural University, No. 2 of Yuan Ming Yuan Xilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China.

Department of Applied Chemistry, China Agricultural University, No. 2 of Yuan Ming Yuan Xilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China.

出版信息

Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2018 Apr;146:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.12.008
PMID:29626994
Abstract

The resistance levels to glyphosate and target-site based resistance mechanisms in susceptible (S) and resistant (R) Conyza canadensis (L.) populations, which were collected from apple orchards around areas of Bohai seas and Loess Plateau in China, were investigated. Among forty C. canadensis populations, eighteen populations (45%) were still susceptible; fourteen populations (35%) evolved low resistance levels resistance to glyphosate with resistance index (RI) of 2.02 to 3.90. In contrast, eight populations (20%) evolved medium resistance levels with RI of 4.35 to 8.38. The shikimic acid concentrations in R populations were highly negative relative with the glyphosate resistance levels in C. canadensis, the Pearson correlation coefficient was -0.82 treated by glyphosate at 1.8mg/L. Three 5-enoylpyruvylshikimate 3'-phosphate synthase genes (EPSPS1, EPSPS2 and EPSPS3) were cloned in all S and glyphosate-resistant C. canadensis populations. No amino acid substitution was identified at site of 102 and 106 in three EPSPS genes, which were reported to confer glyphosate resistance in other weed species. The relative expression level of EPSPS mRNA in R populations (SD07, LN05, SHX06 and SD09) was 4.5 to 13.2 times higher than in S biotype. The Pearson correlation coefficient between EPSPS expression levels and RI was 0.79, which indicated the over expression of EPSPS mRNA may cause these R populations evolve higher resistance level to glyphosate.

摘要

研究了来自中国渤海湾地区和黄土高原苹果园的敏感(S)和抗药性(R)加拿大飞蓬(Conyza canadensis(L.))种群对草甘膦的抗性水平和靶标位点抗性机制。在 40 个加拿大飞蓬种群中,有 18 个种群(45%)仍然敏感;14 个种群(35%)对草甘膦表现出低水平的抗性,抗性指数(RI)为 2.02-3.90。相比之下,有 8 个种群(20%)对草甘膦具有中等水平的抗性,RI 为 4.35-8.38。R 种群中的莽草酸浓度与加拿大飞蓬中的草甘膦抗性水平呈高度负相关,用 1.8mg/L 草甘膦处理时,皮尔逊相关系数为-0.82。在所有 S 型和抗草甘膦的加拿大飞蓬种群中都克隆了三个 5-烯酰基-莽草酸-3'-磷酸合酶基因(EPSPS1、EPSPS2 和 EPSPS3)。在三个 EPSPS 基因的 102 和 106 位点未发现氨基酸取代,这些位点在其他杂草物种中被报道可赋予草甘膦抗性。R 种群(SD07、LN05、SHX06 和 SD09)中 EPSPS mRNA 的相对表达水平比 S 型高 4.5 到 13.2 倍。EPSPS 表达水平与 RI 之间的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.79,这表明 EPSPS mRNA 的过度表达可能导致这些 R 种群对草甘膦产生更高的抗性水平。

相似文献

1
Investigation of glyphosate resistance levels and target-site based resistance (TSR) mechanisms in Conyza canadensis (L.) from apple orchards around areas of Bohai seas and Loess Plateau in China.调查中国环渤海地区和黄土高原苹果园中加拿大蓬(Conyza canadensis (L.))的草甘膦抗性水平和靶标位点抗性(TSR)机制。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2018 Apr;146:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
2
Mechanisms of glyphosate resistance and response to alternative herbicide-based management in populations of the three Conyza species introduced in southern Spain.三种豚草属物种在西班牙南部引入种群中对草甘膦的抗性机制和对替代除草剂管理的响应。
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Aug;74(8):1925-1937. doi: 10.1002/ps.4896. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
3
Transcription of putative tonoplast transporters in response to glyphosate and paraquat stress in Conyza bonariensis and Conyza canadensis and selection of reference genes for qRT-PCR.豚草和小飞蓬中假定液泡膜转运蛋白对草甘膦和百草枯胁迫的转录及qRT-PCR内参基因的筛选
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180794. eCollection 2017.
4
Gene expression in response to glyphosate treatment in fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) - glyphosate death response and candidate resistance genes.拟南芥对草甘膦处理的基因表达反应——草甘膦致死反应和候选抗性基因。
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Oct;74(10):2346-2355. doi: 10.1002/ps.4804. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
5
Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.加拿大飞蓬对草甘膦抗性进化的遗传
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Dec;110(1):58-70. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1804-8. Epub 2004 Oct 22.
6
Two non-target mechanisms are involved in glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis L. Cronq.) biotypes.两种非靶标机制参与了抗草甘膦加拿大飞蓬(Conyza canadensis L. Cronq.)生物型的形成。
J Plant Physiol. 2012 Nov 15;169(17):1673-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
7
Horseweed with reduced susceptibility to glyphosate found in the czech republic.在捷克共和国发现了对草甘膦敏感性降低的马唐。
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Aug 12;57(15):6957-61. doi: 10.1021/jf901292x.
8
Comparative proteomic analysis of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) biotypes identifies candidate proteins for glyphosate resistance.加拿大飞蓬生物型的比较蛋白质组学分析鉴定出抗草甘膦的候选蛋白。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 15;7:42565. doi: 10.1038/srep42565.
9
Non-target-site glyphosate resistance in Conyza bonariensis is based on modified subcellular distribution of the herbicide.野塘蒿对草甘膦的非靶标位点抗性基于除草剂亚细胞分布的改变。
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Jan;73(1):246-253. doi: 10.1002/ps.4293. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Novel Candidate Genes Differentially Expressed in Glyphosate-Treated Horseweed ().草甘膦处理的猪殃殃中差异表达的新候选基因()。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;12(10):1616. doi: 10.3390/genes12101616.

引用本文的文献

1
Target-site EPSPS Pro-106-Ser mutation in Conyza canadensis biotypes with extreme resistance to glyphosate in Ohio and Iowa, USA.美国俄亥俄州和爱荷华州具有极端抗草甘膦特性的加拿大飞蓬生物型中靶位 EPSPS Pro-106-Ser 突变。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 5;10(1):7577. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64458-7.
2
No evidence for early fitness penalty in glyphosate-resistant biotypes of : Common garden experiments in the absence of glyphosate.在抗草甘膦生物型中未发现早期适应性代价的证据:在无草甘膦条件下的同质园实验。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Nov 28;9(24):13678-13689. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5741. eCollection 2019 Dec.