Research Assistant and Dentist, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, Mersin 10, Turkey.
Chief and Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, Mersin 10, Turkey.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):415-420. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.022. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
Ill-fitting restorations can jeopardize dental, periodontal, and systemic health. Repeated ceramic firing may influence the fitting accuracy of restorations, but scientific information regarding this issue is lacking.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the influence of repeated firings on the marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) manufactured with different framework methods, including casting, fully sintered hard alloy milling (FHAM), presintered soft alloy milling (PSAM), and selective laser sintering (SLS).
A total of 60 Co-Cr metal frameworks for 3-unit FPDs were fabricated with 3 different computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques and conventional casting for a typodont model. The discrepancy values for premolar and molar abutments were measured by using the silicone replica technique after fabrication of the framework, second firing, fourth firing, and seventh firing. The replicas were separated into mesiodistal and buccolingual cross-sections, and digital images of the cross-sections were obtained with a stereomicroscope at ×80 magnification. The measurement points were examined to record the discrepancy values (μm) with in-built measuring software. The recorded data were subjected to repeated-measures 4-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc test (α=.05).
For all measurement periods, the marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal discrepancy values differed significantly among the manufacturing groups (P<.001). Moreover, the repeated firings had a statistically significant influence on the discrepancy values of PSAM, FHAM, and SLS groups (P<.05). The cast group was not significantly affected by repeated firings (P>.05). The PSAM group revealed the lowest discrepancy values at all measurement periods (P<.05), except after the second firing in the marginal and axial locations.
The PSAM-fabricated restorations demonstrated superior fitting accuracy. All manufacturing groups were influenced by repeated firings, except the cast group. The marginal discrepancy values of all manufacturing groups were within the range of clinical acceptability (<120 μm).
不合适的修复体可能危及牙齿、牙周和全身健康。反复的陶瓷烧制可能会影响修复体的拟合精度,但关于这个问题的科学信息还很缺乏。
本体外研究的目的是评估和比较不同框架制造方法(铸造、完全烧结硬合金铣削[FHAM]、预烧结软合金铣削[PSAM]和选择性激光烧结[SLS])制造的金属陶瓷 3 单位固定局部义齿(FPD)的重复烧制对边缘、轴向、轴面-咬合和咬合拟合的影响。
共制作了 60 个 Co-Cr 金属框架用于 3 单位 FPD,使用 3 种不同的计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)技术和常规铸造制作典型模型。在制作框架、第二次烧制、第四次烧制和第七次烧制后,使用硅橡胶复制技术测量前磨牙和磨牙桥体的差异值。将复制件分为近远中向和颊舌向横截面,使用立体显微镜在 ×80 放大倍数下获得横截面的数字图像。检查测量点以记录带有内置测量软件的差异值(μm)。记录的数据进行重复测量 4 向方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后检验(α=.05)。
在所有测量期间,制造组之间的边缘、轴向、轴面-咬合和咬合差异值均有显著差异(P<.001)。此外,重复烧制对 PSAM、FHAM 和 SLS 组的差异值有统计学显著影响(P<.05)。铸造组不受重复烧制的显著影响(P>.05)。PSAM 组在所有测量期间显示出最低的差异值(P<.05),除了在边缘和轴向位置的第二次烧制后。
PSAM 制造的修复体具有较高的拟合精度。除铸造组外,所有制造组均受重复烧制的影响。所有制造组的边缘差异值均在临床可接受范围内(<120μm)。