Karimi Mansour, Neshandar Asli Hamid, Hamrah Yeganeh, Ghaffari Mohammad Ebrahim, Falahchai Mehran
School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Sciences Research Center, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70173. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70173.
Only a small number of studies conducted on implant-supported fixed multi-unit restorations have evaluated the semi-digital fabrication techniques. This study aimed to assess the marginal and internal adaptation of implant-supported three-unit metal frameworks fabricated by the conventional, semi-digital, and fully digital techniques before and after porcelain application.
In this in vitro study, 120 three-unit metal frameworks were fabricated by five different techniques (n = 20): fabrication of metal frameworks from hard metal by the milling technique, direct 3D-printing of metal, milling of resin pattern and subsequent casting, 3D-printing of resin pattern and subsequent casting, and conventional waxing and subsequent casting. The marginal and internal adaptation of the frameworks was evaluated before and after porcelain application by using the silicone replica technique. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons with the Games-Howell and paired samples tests (α = 0.05).
Before porcelain application, resin pattern milling, and subsequent casting resulted in the smallest marginal gap, while hard metal milling yielded the largest marginal gap. The fully digital techniques yielded the largest cuspal and fossa gaps, while the conventional method yielded the largest axial gap. After porcelain application, metal 3D-printing and conventional casting resulted in comparable (p = 0.109) marginal gaps, smaller than hard metal milling (p < 0.001). The conventional casting method yielded the smallest cuspal and fossa gaps (p < 0.001). Porcelain application significantly increased the gap size at all measurement points (p < 0.001).
The fabrication technique significantly affected the marginal and internal adaptation of implant-supported three-unit metal frameworks both before and after porcelain application.
在种植体支持的固定多单位修复体上进行的研究中,只有少数评估了半数字制造技术。本研究旨在评估采用传统、半数字和全数字技术制造的种植体支持的三单位金属框架在应用瓷之前和之后的边缘及内部适合性。
在这项体外研究中,采用五种不同技术制作了120个三单位金属框架(n = 20):通过铣削技术用硬质合金制作金属框架、直接3D打印金属、铣削树脂模型并随后铸造、3D打印树脂模型并随后铸造以及传统的上蜡并随后铸造。使用硅橡胶复制技术在应用瓷之前和之后评估框架的边缘及内部适合性。使用方差分析进行数据分析,随后通过Games-Howell和配对样本检验进行两两比较(α = 0.05)。
在应用瓷之前,树脂模型铣削并随后铸造产生的边缘间隙最小,而硬质合金铣削产生的边缘间隙最大。全数字技术产生的尖窝间隙最大,而传统方法产生的轴向间隙最大