Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center of San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229.
Department of Kinesiology, Health, and Nutrition, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
PM R. 2018 Oct;10(10):1004-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
Shoulder dysfunction is common in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) with an incidence of up to 63%. Dysfunction is a result of muscle imbalances, specifically denervated rotator cuff muscles that are repetitively used during manual wheelchair propulsion.
To determine which arm stroke technique, pump (P) or semicircular (SC), is most energy efficient for long periods of propulsion.
A randomized study with repeated measures observations.
The study was performed at an institutional gait analysis laboratory.
18 able-bodied (AB) male participants were studied and randomized into one of 2 conditions, SC or P.
Shoulder muscle fatigue was measured by changes in Borg CR10 Rate of Perceived Exertion (Borg RPE) and upper extremity strength via a handheld dynamometer. Participants were studied and assigned into one of 2 conditions of wheelchair arm propulsion patterns, SC or P group, and propelled on a wheelchair treadmill for 10 minutes.
The primary outcomes included recordings of Borg RPE scale during continuous wheelchair propulsion and pre- and post-test dynamometer testing means for bilateral elbow and shoulder extension. Analysis of covariance, t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used in analyzing data.
Although not significant (P = .23), the Borg RPE scores for the SC condition were consistently higher than the scores for the P condition. In addition, the dynamometer pre- and post-test readings demonstrated a larger decrease for the SC condition participants than for the P condition participants, but were not statistically significant.
These data demonstrate that the SC wheelchair propulsion pattern appears to be more fatiguing to shoulder muscles than the P propulsion pattern. However, more data would need to be collected to find a significant difference.
II.
脊髓损伤(SCI)患者常出现肩部功能障碍,发病率高达 63%。功能障碍是肌肉失衡的结果,特别是在手动轮椅推进过程中反复使用的失神经支配的肩袖肌肉。
确定哪种手臂划动技术,即泵式(P)或半圆形(SC),在长时间推进中更节能。
一项具有重复测量观察的随机研究。
该研究在机构步态分析实验室进行。
18 名健全男性参与者参与研究,并随机分为 SC 或 P 两组之一。
通过 Borg CR10 感觉用力等级(Borg RPE)变化和使用手持测力计的上肢力量来测量肩部肌肉疲劳。参与者接受研究并被分配到轮椅手臂推进模式的两种条件之一,即 SC 或 P 组,并在轮椅跑步机上推进 10 分钟。
主要结果包括在连续轮椅推进期间记录 Borg RPE 量表,以及双侧肘和肩伸肌预测试和后测试测力计测试的平均值。使用协方差分析、t 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对数据进行分析。
虽然没有统计学意义(P=.23),但 SC 条件的 Borg RPE 评分始终高于 P 条件的评分。此外,测力计预测试和后测试读数显示,SC 条件参与者的下降幅度大于 P 条件参与者,但无统计学意义。
这些数据表明,与 P 推进模式相比,SC 轮椅推进模式似乎更易使肩部肌肉疲劳。但是,需要收集更多数据才能发现显著差异。
II。