Sharma Sandeep, Suthar Om Prakash, Tak M L, Thanvi Abhilasha, Paliwal Naveen, Karnawat Rakesh
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):262-266. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_226_17.
Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease.
This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
This was a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study.
A total of ninety patients were selected and randomized into three groups of thirty patients each: Group C received infusion of 20 mL 0.9% normal saline (NS) over 10 min, Group D received infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min, and Group E received infusion of esmolol 1.5 mg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min. Three minutes after the completion of infusion, patients were induced with general anesthesia. Baseline parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded before administration of study drugs and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 min after intubation.
One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among the groups and unpaired -test was used for comparison within the groups along with Tukey's test for post test analysis.
Mean HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, and RPP values remained significantly lower in Group D than that of Group C and Group E at all time intervals up to 10 min after intubation.
Both dexmedetomidine and esmolol suppressed the hemodynamic response to intubation when compared to control group, but dexmedetomidine is more effective than esmolol in maintaining hemodynamic stability following laryngoscopy and intubation.
喉镜检查和气管插管会引发强烈的交感神经反应,这可能会使已有心血管疾病的患者出现心律失常、心肌缺血和脑血管意外。
本研究旨在比较右美托咪定和艾司洛尔对全身麻醉下择期手术患者喉镜检查和气管插管时血流动力学反应的影响。
这是一项前瞻性、随机对照双盲研究。
共选取90例患者,随机分为三组,每组30例:C组在10分钟内输注20毫升0.9%生理盐水(NS),D组在10分钟内输注用20毫升NS稀释的1微克/千克右美托咪定,E组在10分钟内输注用20毫升NS稀释的1.5毫克/千克艾司洛尔。输注完成三分钟后,对患者进行全身麻醉诱导。在给予研究药物前以及插管后1、3、5、7和10分钟记录心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和速率压力乘积(RPP)等基线参数。
采用单因素方差分析进行组间比较,采用非配对t检验进行组内比较,并采用Tukey检验进行事后分析。
直至插管后10分钟的所有时间间隔内,D组的平均HR、SBP、DBP、MAP和RPP值均显著低于C组和E组。
与对照组相比,右美托咪定和艾司洛尔均能抑制插管时的血流动力学反应,但在喉镜检查和插管后维持血流动力学稳定性方面,右美托咪定比艾司洛尔更有效。