Moshayedi Pouria, Giurgiutiu Dan-Victor, Ducruet Andrew F, Jankowitz Brian T, Jadhav Ashutosh P
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Winchester Neurological Consultants, Winchester, Virginia, USA.
Interv Neurol. 2018 Feb;7(1-2):36-41. doi: 10.1159/000482012. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
We report 2 cases of parent artery occlusion (PAO) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fusiform aneurysm embolization after superselective provocative testing was performed to confirm distal territory viability. The first case involves a patient in the second decade of life who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent PAO after a balloon test occlusion in the distal ACA revealed no neurophysiology changes. The second case involves another patient in the forth decade of life who presented with an enlarging pseudoaneurysm and underwent PAO after a sodium amobarbital infusion in the distal ACA revealed no clinical change. Both patients tolerated PAO without clinical compromise. PAO after provocative testing may be a safe and effective strategy in the management of fusiform aneurysm treatment.
Provocative testing with superselective balloon test occlusion and sodium amobarbital infusion are both viable options for clinical and physiological interrogation of brain tissue prior to parent vessel occlusion. Neurophysiological monitoring may be a useful surrogate for clinical examination after provocative testing, particularly if patients were treated under general anesthesia.
我们报告2例在进行超选择性激发试验以确认远端区域存活能力后,对大脑前动脉(ACA)梭形动脉瘤进行栓塞时发生的供血动脉闭塞(PAO)病例。第一例患者为二十多岁,因蛛网膜下腔出血就诊,在远端ACA进行球囊试验闭塞后未发现神经生理学变化,随后接受了PAO。第二例患者为四十多岁,因假性动脉瘤增大就诊,在远端ACA注入阿米妥钠后未出现临床变化,随后接受了PAO。两名患者均耐受PAO且未出现临床损害。激发试验后的PAO可能是梭形动脉瘤治疗管理中的一种安全有效的策略。
超选择性球囊试验闭塞和阿米妥钠注入激发试验都是在供血血管闭塞前对脑组织进行临床和生理学检查的可行选择。激发试验后,神经生理学监测可能是临床检查的有用替代方法,特别是在患者接受全身麻醉治疗时。