Gauci M O, Bonnevialle N, Moineau G, Baba M, Walch G, Boileau P
Institut Universitaire Locomoteur et du Sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2 and Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice Cedex 1, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse-Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Bone Joint J. 2018 Apr 1;100-B(4):485-492. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0495.R2.
Controversy about the use of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in young arthritic patients relates to which is the ideal form of fixation for the glenoid component: cemented or cementless. This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of aTSA when used in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), and to compare the survival of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed glenoid components.
A total of 69 consecutive aTSAs were performed in 67 patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 54 years (35 to 60). Of these aTSAs, 46 were undertaken using a cemented polyethylene component and 23 were undertaken using a cementless metal-backed component. The age, gender, preoperative function, mobility, premorbid glenoid erosion, and length of follow-up were comparable in the two groups. The patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean of 10.3 years (5 to 12, sd 26) postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision as the endpoint.
A total of 26 shoulders (38%) underwent revision surgery: ten (22%) in the polyethylene group and 16 (70%) in the metal-backed group (p < 0.0001). At 12 years' follow-up, the rate of implant survival was 74% (sd 0.09) for polyethylene components and 24% (sd 0.10) for metal-backed components (p < 0.0002). Glenoid loosening or failure was the indication for revision in the polyethylene group, whereas polyethylene wear with metal-on-metal contact, instability, and insufficiency of the rotator cuff were the indications for revision in the metal-backed group. Preoperative posterior subluxation of the humeral head with a biconcave/retroverted glenoid (Walch B2) had an adverse effect on the survival of a metal-backed component.
The survival of a cemented polyethylene glenoid component is three times higher than that of a cementless metal-backed glenoid component ten years after aTSA in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Patients with a biconcave (B2) glenoid have the highest risk of failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:485-92.
在年轻的关节炎患者中,关于使用解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)的争议在于,肩胛盂假体的理想固定方式是骨水泥固定还是非骨水泥固定。本研究旨在评估aTSA应用于年龄<60岁的原发性盂肱关节骨关节炎(OA)患者时的假体生存率,并比较骨水泥固定的全聚乙烯肩胛盂假体和非骨水泥金属背衬肩胛盂假体的生存率。
对67例年龄<60岁的原发性盂肱关节OA患者连续实施了69例aTSA。他们手术时的平均年龄为54岁(35至60岁)。在这些aTSA中,46例采用骨水泥固定的聚乙烯假体,23例采用非骨水泥金属背衬假体。两组患者的年龄、性别、术前功能、活动度、术前肩胛盂侵蚀情况及随访时间均具有可比性。术后平均10.3年(5至12年,标准差2.6年)对患者进行临床和影像学复查。以翻修为终点进行Kaplan-Meier生存率分析。
共有26例肩关节(38%)接受了翻修手术:聚乙烯组10例(22%),金属背衬组16例(70%)(p<0.0001)。随访12年时,聚乙烯假体的生存率为74%(标准差0.09),金属背衬假体的生存率为24%(标准差0.10)(p<0.0002)。肩胛盂松动或失败是聚乙烯组翻修的原因,而金属背衬组翻修的原因是聚乙烯磨损伴金属对金属接触、不稳定和肩袖功能不全。术前肱骨头后脱位伴双凹/后倾肩胛盂(Walch B2型)对金属背衬假体的生存率有不利影响。
在年龄<60岁的原发性盂肱关节OA患者中,aTSA术后10年,骨水泥固定的聚乙烯肩胛盂假体的生存率比非骨水泥金属背衬肩胛盂假体高三倍。双凹(B2型)肩胛盂患者失败风险最高。引用本文:《骨与关节杂志》2018年;100-B:485-492。