1 Department of Radiology, NYU Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 E 17th St, Rm 600, New York, NY 10003.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jun;210(6):1309-1316. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18636. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether adding DWI to conventional MRI of the sacroiliac joints improves the diagnostic performance of MRI readers in the detection of sacroiliitis.
MR images of the sacroiliac joints of 63 patients with lower back pain obtained between January 2016 and December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Three readers reviewed the MRI studies for bone marrow edema lesions around the sacroiliac joints as a marker of active sacroiliitis and gave a diagnostic confidence score of 0-4 using MRI without DWI and MRI with DWI in separate sessions. The normalized apparent diffusion coefficient mean (nADC) was measured. Clinical and radiologic data using the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria were the reference for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis. Diagnostic performance, confidence scores, and interreader agreement for the MRI methods were compared. The nADC values of patients with and those without sacroiliitis were compared.
The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MRI without DWI were 68.3%, 69.0%, and 67.6% and for MRI with DWI were 74.6%, 69.0%, and 79.4% (accuracy and sensitivity, p > 0.100; specificity, p = 0.039). The mean confidence score for MRI without DWI was 3.60 and for MRI with DWI was 3.67 (p = 0.270). The kappa coefficient for MRI without DWI was 0.28 and for MRI with DWI was 0.46 (p = 0.041). The nADC in patients with sacroiliitis was 3.86 and in patients without sacroiliitis was 1.6 (p ≤ 0.001). The nADC AUC was 0.758 (95% CI, 0.67-0.83).
The addition of DWI to conventional MRI does not significantly improve overall diagnostic performance in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, or confidence in the detection of inflammatory sacroiliitis, but it does have increased specificity and interobserver agreement. ADC threshold values can be used as predictors of sacroiliitis but give no added advantage over MRI with DWI.
本研究旨在确定在检测骶髂关节炎时,将弥散加权成像(DWI)加入常规磁共振成像(MRI)是否能提高 MRI 读者的诊断性能。
回顾性分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间 63 例腰痛患者的骶髂关节 MRI 图像。3 名读者分别在两次会议中,使用不包括 DWI 的 MRI 和包括 DWI 的 MRI 对骶髂关节周围骨髓水肿病变(作为活动性骶髂关节炎的标志物)进行阅片,并给出 0-4 分的诊断置信度评分。测量标准化表观扩散系数均值(nADC)。使用评估强直性脊柱炎国际协会标准的临床和影像学数据作为骶髂关节炎诊断的参考。比较 MRI 方法的诊断性能、置信度评分和读者间一致性。比较有和无骶髂关节炎患者的 nADC 值。
不包括 DWI 的 MRI 的准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为 68.3%、69.0%和 67.6%,而包括 DWI 的 MRI 则分别为 74.6%、69.0%和 79.4%(准确性和敏感性,p>0.100;特异性,p=0.039)。不包括 DWI 的 MRI 的平均置信度评分为 3.60,而包括 DWI 的 MRI 为 3.67(p=0.270)。不包括 DWI 的 MRI 的κ系数为 0.28,而包括 DWI 的 MRI 为 0.46(p=0.041)。有骶髂关节炎患者的 nADC 为 3.86,无骶髂关节炎患者的 nADC 为 1.6(p≤0.001)。nADC 的 AUC 为 0.758(95%CI,0.67-0.83)。
在检测炎症性骶髂关节炎的准确性、敏感性或置信度方面,将 DWI 加入常规 MRI 并不能显著提高整体诊断性能,但确实提高了特异性和观察者间一致性。ADC 阈值可作为骶髂关节炎的预测指标,但与包括 DWI 的 MRI 相比没有优势。