Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
Med Care. 2018 Jun;56(6):497-504. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000910.
There is increasing emphasis on the use of patient-reported experience data to assess practice performance, particularly in the setting of patient-centered medical homes. Yet we lack understanding of what organizational processes relate to patient experiences.
Examine associations between organizational processes practices adopt to become PCMH and patient experiences with care.
We analyzed visit data from patients (n=8356) at adult primary care practices (n=22) in a large health system. We evaluated the associations between practice organizational processes and patient experience using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with an exchangeable correlation structure to account for patient clustering by practice in multivariate models, adjusting for several practice-level and patient-level characteristics. We evaluated if these associations varied by race/ethnicity, insurance type, and the degree of patient comorbidity MEASURES:: Predictors include overall PCMH adoption and adoption of six organizational processes: access and communications, patient tracking and registry, care management, test referral tracking, quality improvement and external coordination. Primary outcome was overall patient experience.
In our full sample, overall PCMH adoption score was not significantly associated with patient experience outcomes. However, among subpopulations with higher comorbidities, the overall PCMH adoption score was positively associated with overall patient experience measures [0.2 (0.06, 0.4); P=0.006]. Differences by race/ethnicity and insurance type in associations between specific organizational processes and patient experience were noted.
Although some organizational processes relate to patients' experiences with care irrespective of the background of the patient, further efforts are needed to align practice efforts with patient experience.
越来越强调使用患者报告的体验数据来评估实践表现,尤其是在以患者为中心的医疗之家的环境中。然而,我们对与患者体验相关的组织流程知之甚少。
检查成为 PCMH 时采用的组织流程实践与患者护理体验之间的关联。
我们分析了来自大型医疗系统中成人初级保健实践(n=22)的 8356 名患者的就诊数据。我们使用具有可交换相关性结构的广义估计方程(GEE)评估了实践组织流程与患者体验之间的关联,以在多变量模型中根据实践对患者进行聚类,调整了几个实践水平和患者水平的特征。我们评估了这些关联是否因种族/民族、保险类型和患者共病程度而有所不同。
预测因素包括整体 PCMH 采用情况以及采用的六种组织流程:访问和沟通、患者跟踪和登记、护理管理、测试转介跟踪、质量改进和外部协调。主要结果是整体患者体验。
在我们的全样本中,整体 PCMH 采用评分与患者体验结果没有显著关联。然而,在共病程度较高的亚组中,整体 PCMH 采用评分与整体患者体验指标呈正相关[0.2(0.06,0.4);P=0.006]。注意到特定组织流程与患者体验之间的关联在种族/民族和保险类型方面存在差异。
尽管一些组织流程与患者的护理体验相关,而与患者的背景无关,但仍需要进一步努力使实践努力与患者体验保持一致。