From the Centre for Infectious Disease Control, Netherlands Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Statistics and Bio-Informatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Epidemiology. 2018 Jul;29(4):562-570. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000841.
Historically, measles incidence has shown clear seasonal patterns driven by the school calendar, but since the start of mass vaccination in developed countries there are only occasional outbreaks, which may have changed the effect of school vacations on transmission. In 2013-2014, a large measles epidemic took place in a low vaccination coverage area in The Netherlands, allowing us to quantify current-day measles transmission and the effect of school vacations.
We fitted a dynamic transmission model to notification and hospitalization time series data of the Dutch 2013-2014 measles epidemic. Our primary aim was to estimate the reduction in contact rate during school vacations and the number of cases averted due to the vacation. In addition, because the summer vacations were time-staggered in three regions, we could distinguish within-region from across-region effects of school vacations.
We estimated a 53% (95% credible interval: 45%, 60%) reduction in contact rate during school vacations, resulting in 4900 (3400-7100) averted cases (estimated outbreak size: 16,600 [12,600-23,200]). There was a shift from mainly local transmission during school term to mainly cross-regional transmission during vacations. With seroprevalence data, we derived a current-day estimate of 15 to 27 for R0 (number of secondary cases per primary case in a susceptible population).
School vacations are associated with greatly reduced overall measles transmission. However, transmission is not eliminated, and increased long-distance travel may even promote spread to other areas. Therefore, we estimate that school closure is unlikely to prevent measles epidemics unless there are still few cases and the community is well vaccinated.
麻疹发病率历来呈现出明显的季节性模式,这主要与学校的校历有关。然而,自发达国家开始大规模疫苗接种以来,麻疹偶有爆发,这可能改变了学校假期对传播的影响。2013-2014 年,荷兰一个疫苗接种率较低的地区发生了大规模麻疹疫情,这使我们能够量化当前的麻疹传播情况和学校假期的影响。
我们使用荷兰 2013-2014 年麻疹疫情的监测和住院时间序列数据,拟合了一个动态传播模型。我们的主要目的是估计学校假期期间接触率的降低程度,以及因假期而避免的病例数。此外,由于三个地区的暑假错开了时间,我们可以区分校内和校外的学校假期效应。
我们估计,学校假期期间接触率降低了 53%(95%可信区间:45%,60%),从而避免了 4900 例(3400-7100 例)病例(估计的疫情规模:16600 [12600-23200])。传播模式从学校学期期间的主要本地传播转变为假期期间的主要跨区域传播。利用血清流行率数据,我们得出了当前 R0 值的估计值为 15-27(易感人群中每例原发感染导致的继发感染病例数)。
学校假期与麻疹整体传播的大幅减少有关。然而,传播并没有被完全阻断,而且长途旅行的增加甚至可能促进疾病向其他地区传播。因此,我们估计除非社区内的病例数仍然很少且疫苗接种率较高,否则关闭学校不太可能预防麻疹疫情。