Suppr超能文献

踝阻滞下前足手术中神经周围与全身应用地塞米松的随机双盲研究。

Perineural Versus Systemic Dexamethasone in Front-Foot Surgery Under Ankle Block: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier Narbonne, France.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):732-737. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000769.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Among the different adjuvants, dexamethasone is one of the most accepted to prolong the effect of local anesthetics. This study aims to determine the superiority of perineural over systemic dexamethasone administration after a single-shot ankle block in metatarsal osteotomy.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. A total of 100 patients presenting for metatarsal osteotomy with an ankle block were randomized into 2 groups: 30 mL ropivacaine 0.375% + perineural dexamethasone 4 mg (1 mL) + 2.5 mL of systemic saline solution (PNDex group, n = 50) and 30 mL ropivacaine 0.375% + 1 mL of perineural saline solution + intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg (2.5 mL) (IVDex group, n = 50). The primary end point was the duration of analgesia defined as the time between the performance of the ankle block and the first administration of rescue analgesia with tramadol.

RESULTS

Time period to first rescue analgesia with tramadol was similar in the IVDex group and the PNDex group. Data are expressed as mean (SD) or median (range). Duration of analgesia was 23.2 (9.5) hours in the IVDex group and 19 (8.2) hours in the PNDex group (P = 0.4). Consumption of tramadol during the first 48 hours was 0 mg (0-150 mg) in the IVDex group versus 0 mg (0-250 mg) in the PNDex group (P = 0.59). Four (8%) and 12 (24%) patients reported nausea or vomiting in the IVDex group and the PNDex group, respectively (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In front-foot surgery, perineural and systemic administrations of dexamethasone are equivalent for postoperative pain relief when used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine ankle block.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02904538.

摘要

背景与目的

在各种佐剂中,地塞米松是最常被接受的一种,可延长局部麻醉剂的作用。本研究旨在比较单次踝部阻滞中神经周与全身应用地塞米松对跖骨切开术后镇痛的优势。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究。共纳入 100 例行跖骨切开术的患者,采用踝部阻滞,随机分为两组:30 mL 0.375%罗哌卡因+神经周地塞米松 4 mg(1 mL)+2.5 mL 全身生理盐水(PNDex 组,n=50)和 30 mL 0.375%罗哌卡因+1 mL 神经周生理盐水+静脉地塞米松 10 mg(2.5 mL)(IVDex 组,n=50)。主要终点为镇痛持续时间,定义为踝部阻滞至首次使用曲马多解救镇痛的时间。

结果

IVDex 组和 PNDex 组首次使用曲马多解救镇痛的时间相似。数据以均数(标准差)或中位数(范围)表示。IVDex 组的镇痛持续时间为 23.2(9.5)小时,PNDex 组为 19(8.2)小时(P=0.4)。IVDex 组 48 小时内曲马多的消耗量为 0 mg(0-150 mg),PNDex 组为 0 mg(0-250 mg)(P=0.59)。IVDex 组和 PNDex 组分别有 4 例(8%)和 12 例(24%)患者报告恶心或呕吐(P=0.03)。

结论

在前脚手术中,罗哌卡因踝部阻滞中神经周与全身应用地塞米松作为佐剂,镇痛效果相当。

临床试验注册

本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02904538。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验