Department of Interventional Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Mar;22(6):1776-1781. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201803_14596.
We aimed to compare and analyze the long-term efficacy and safety between kelp micro gelation (KMG) and gelfoam particles in partial splenic embolization (PSE).
This study retrospectively included 65 liver cirrhosis patients with comorbidity of hypersplenism who were admitted in Nanfang Hospital from July 2008 to May 2012. Among the included patients, 33 patients were in KMG-PSE group, and 32 cases were included in Gelfoam-PSE group. According to the Child-Pugh criteria, all cases were divided into grade A, B, and C, respectively. All eligible subjects received CT or MR examination and laboratory examination.
Our results showed that both KMG and gelfoam particles could substantially improve the short-term efficacy of thrombocytopenia leukopenia. However, the efficacy of KMG is superior to that of gelfoam. Due to the characteristic of KMG as a permanent agent, KMG may result in an obvious pain in the spleen after PSE, especially in patients with megalosplenia. KMG was more expensive than gelfoam particles. The complication rate in patents with great embolization was much higher than that with less embolization.
The efficacy of KMG is superior to that of gelfoam in both short-term and long-term. To effectively control the occurrence of severe complication, the embolization should be controlled less than 70% regardless of the embolization agents.
比较和分析海藻酸钠微球(KMG)与明胶海绵颗粒(Gelfoam)在部分性脾动脉栓塞术(PSE)中的长期疗效和安全性。
本研究回顾性纳入了 2008 年 7 月至 2012 年 5 月期间在南方医院就诊的合并脾功能亢进的 65 例肝硬化患者。其中 33 例患者行 KMG-PSE 治疗,32 例行 Gelfoam-PSE 治疗。根据 Child-Pugh 分级标准,所有患者均分为 A、B、C 级。所有纳入患者均行 CT 或 MRI 检查和实验室检查。
KMG 和明胶海绵颗粒均可显著改善血小板减少和白细胞减少的短期疗效,但 KMG 的疗效优于明胶海绵颗粒。由于 KMG 为永久性栓塞剂,PSE 后部分患者会出现明显的脾脏疼痛,尤其是巨脾患者。KMG 比明胶海绵颗粒更昂贵。严重栓塞患者的并发症发生率明显高于轻度栓塞患者。
KMG 在短期和长期疗效方面均优于明胶海绵颗粒。为有效控制严重并发症的发生,无论栓塞剂如何,栓塞程度均应控制在 70%以下。